Surface nesting by little penguins on Penguin Island, Western Australia
Abstract
(1991). Surface Nesting by Little Penguins on Penguin Island, Western Australia. Emu - Austral Ornithology: Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 190-193.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Visual contact may be a key component of little penguin fear of visitors.
“Although the effects of visual contact were not specifically examined in these studies, it can be surmised that visual contact may be a key component to little penguin fear of visitors.”
From Effect of Covering a Visitor Viewing Area Window on the Behaviour of Zoo-Housed Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Wild little penguins increase their avoidance of areas with high human traffic and footpaths when nesting.
“with Klomp and colleagues [37] and Weerheim and colleagues [34] who found wild little penguins increased their avoidance of areas with high human traffic and footpaths when nesting.”
From Effect of Covering a Visitor Viewing Area Window on the Behaviour of Zoo-Housed Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Wild little penguins prefer to nest further away from visitor paths or areas of high human disturbance.
“Wild little penguins also prefer to nest further away from visitor paths or areas of high human disturbance [39,40].”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
Little penguins found at different locations may respond to visitors in a similar manner if the nature of visitor contact is the same.
“Also, this research adds to the growing evidence that little penguins, found at different locations, may respond to visitors in a similar manner if the nature of visitor contact is the same (Klomp et al. 1991;Weerheim et al. 2003;Giling et al. 2008;Carroll et al. 2016).”
From Effects of the presence of zoo visitors on zoo‐housed little penguins ( <i>Eudyptula minor</i> ) (2022) · cites this paper as Klomp et al. 1991
Characteristics of human contact are consistent with studies on other species of zoo-housed penguins and wild penguins.
“These characteristics of human contact are also consistent with studies on other species of zoo-housed penguins and wild penguins (Klomp et al. 1991;Wienecke et al. 1995;Nimon 1997;Giese 1998;Weerheim et al. 2003;Holmes et al. 2005;Giling et al. 2008;Shaughnessy and Briggs 2009;Schuster 2010;Ozella et al. 2014).”
From Effects of the presence of zoo visitors on zoo‐housed little penguins ( <i>Eudyptula minor</i> ) (2022) · cites this paper as Klomp et al. 1991
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Klomp, N. I., Meathrel, C. E., Wienecke, B. C., & Wooller, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Venue
- Emu - Austral Ornithology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 190-193
- ISSN
- 0158-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5540
- OpenAlex
- W2330433847
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emu - Austral Ornithology (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- little penguin, Eudyptes chrysocome, nesting behavior, Penguin Island, seabird breeding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review