CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 232Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and BeyondIndigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Kaitiakitanga: Maori perspectives on conservation

Roberts, Mere, Norman, Waerete, Minhinnick, Nganeko, Wihongi, Del, Kirkwood, Carmen·1995·Pacific Conservation Biology
DOI 10.1071/pc950007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Maori, like other indigenous peoples, are increasingly involved in attempts to provide appropriate cultural responses to environmental issues. These include efforts to translate and incorporate isolated parts of their language and traditional practises into the prevailing culture. Major problems with this process are the incommensurability of such attempts whereby the real meaning of a custom or word is frequently debased and divorced from its traditional cultural setting, so that its proper functioning is impaired. Added to this is the ignorance on the part of many concerning the conceptual world view, traditional beliefs and practices of the Maori ? or, if knowing these things, a lack of respect for their validity. On the other hand there are some, especially among the modern conservation movement, who have a more empathetic attitude towards indigenous ecological knowledge, but who thereby assume that their environmental ethics and those of indigenous peoples are motivated by similar philosophies and share similar aims. Not only is this assumption often wrong, it may also contribute to the inability of the western conservation movement to properly serve the needs of, and to fully empower, indigenous conservation aspirations as guaranteed to Maori under the Treaty of Waitangi. This paper addresses some of these issues by providing Maori perspectives on an increasingly important environmental concept: that of kaitiaki, and kaitiakitanga.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/pc950007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–226 of 226

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, M., Norman, W., Minhinnick, N., Wihongi, D., & Kirkwood, C.
Venue
Pacific Conservation Biology
Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Published
1995-03-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
7-20
ISSN
  • 1038-2097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2204-4604
DOI
10.1071/pc950007
OpenAlex
W2253257131
Cited by
232
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.org/10.1071/journalslicense (vor, 11031 d)
Locations
Pacific Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
kaitiakitanga, kaitiaki, Māori, indigenous conservation, traditional ecological knowledge, environmental ethics, Treaty of Waitangi, incommensurability, traditional beliefs and practices, Māori perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review