The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of the 15 N natural abundance technique for the quantification of the contribution of N 2 fixation to sugar cane and other grasses
Open accessAbstract
This paper originates from an address at the 8th International Symposium on Nitrogen Fixation with Non-Legumes, Sydney, NSW, December 2000 The use of the 15N natural abundance technique to quantify contribution of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) to any plant is based on the observation that N derived from soil is generally slightly different [usually higher in 15N abundance (δ15N‰)] than that of the air. Plants or micro-organisms growing solely on BNF generally accumulate N with 15N isotopic abundance lower than that of the air (i.e. δ15N‰ is negative), while plants obtaining all N from the soil generally show a positive δ15N‰ signal. The technique is applied by estimating the 15N abundance of the putative ‘N2-fixing’ crop and analysing the 15N abundance of neighbouring non-N2-fixing reference plants. However, often there are such large variations in the N derived from the soil by different non-N2-fixing plants that in natural ecosystems it is often impossible to even distinguish plants that are benefiting form BNF, let alone quantity this contribution. The reasons why soil derived N can vary so widely, especially in natural ecosystems, are briefly discussed and a sampling strategy is described to assess possible BNF inputs to sugar cane plants in commercial plantations in Brazil. The results suggest that in nine of the 11 sites studied, BNF inputs were significant ranging from 25 to 60% of N assimilated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge
Karp, A., & Shield, I. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02432.x · Cited by 509
Van Deynze, A., Zamora, P., Delaux, P.-M., Heitmann, C., Jayaraman, D., Rajasekar, S., Graham, D., Maeda, J., Gibson, D., Schwartz, K. D., et al. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Boddey, R. M., Polidoro, J. C., Resende, A. S., Alves, B. J. R., & Urquiaga, S.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2001-09-26
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 889-895
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W1683146570
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the 15 N natural abundance technique for the quantification of the contribution of N 2 fixation to sugar cane and other grasses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp01058
- The paper
- Boddey, R. M., Polidoro, J. C., Resende, A. S., Alves, B. J. R., & Urquiaga, S. (2001). Use of the 15 N natural abundance technique for the quantification of the contribution of N 2 fixation to sugar cane and other grasses. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp01058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.