Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Physiology of Starch and Protein Deposition in the Endosperm of Wheat

Jenner, CF, Ugalde, TD, Aspinall, D·1991·Functional Plant Biology

Abstract

Yield and protein percentage are key issues in the production and marketing of wheat. Yield is a measure of the activity of processes contributing to deposition of starch in the grain, and protein percentage, while not independent of yield, reflects processes in nitrogen metabolism. This paper considers starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat from a physiological point of view and, in particular, explores the extent to which deposition of starch or protein can be manipulated and increased independently of the other product. Rate and duration of both starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat are all independent events, controlled by separate mechanisms. Consideration of this independence can contribute to promoting specific responses within the plant that culminate in starch and protein deposition, whether attempts at improvement be genetic or agronomic in approach. The capacity, or potential, of the grain to accumulate dry matter is established during the grain enlargement phase, that is within the first 15-20 days after anthesis. Genetic, morphological and physiological factors influence development of this capacity, but a major determinant is a substrate effect on mitotic activity in the endosperm. Grain filling commences 10-15 days after anthesis and occupies the last 20-30 days until the grain ripens. Grain filling is the deposition of polymeric product in cells and organelles formed during the grain enlargement phase. Undoubtedly, stress curtails assimilate supply during grain filling but, under adequate growing conditions, both the rate and duration of starch deposition during grain filling are determined mainly by factors that operate within or close to the grain itself. On the other hand, the rate and duration of protein deposition are determined mainly by factors of supply external to the grain. This contrast can be considered in its simplest form as starch deposition lying on an asymptotic region of a rate-versus-supply relationship, while protein deposition lies on a linear region. Strategies for improving starch and protein deposition in wheat are discussed. Starch yield and protein yield should be selected as independent traits in cultivar improvement, and crop management should reflect differences in source-sink relations for starch deposition and protein deposition during the grain filling stage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/pp9910211

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Jenner, C., Ugalde, T., & Aspinall, D.
Venue
Functional Plant Biology
Published
1991
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
211
ISSN
1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159368062
Cited by
408
References
0
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Physiology of Starch and Protein Deposition in the Endosperm of Wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9910211
The paper
Jenner, C., Ugalde, T., & Aspinall, D. (1991). The Physiology of Starch and Protein Deposition in the Endosperm of Wheat. Functional Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9910211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.