The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Short-Term Measurements of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Several C4 Species
Abstract
Carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) and leaf gas-exchange were measured simultaneously for a number of C4 species. Linear relationships were found between A and the ratio of intercellular to ambient partial pressures of CO2, pI/pa. These data were used to estimate the fraction of CO2 released by C4-acid decarboxylation in the bundle sheath, which subsequently leaks out to the mesophyll. We define this fraction as the leakiness of the system and it is also a measure of the extent to which phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylations exceed ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylations. For Sorghum bicolor and Amaranthus edulis, leakiness was estimated at 0.2 and was constant over a wide range of irradiances (between 480 and 1600 μmol quanta m-2 s-1), intercellular CO2 pressures (between 30 and 350 μbar) and leaf temperatures (from 21ºC to 34ºC). At irradiances less than 240 μmol quanta m-2 s-1, leakiness appeared to increase. For a number of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous species, of the various C4-decarboxylation types, leakiness was also estimated at 0.2. Contrary to expectation, amongst the 11 species examined, those with suberised lamellae did not show lower values of leakiness than those without suberised lamellae. For one NAD-ME and one PCK monocot, the estimates of leakiness were significantly higher at 0.30 and 0.25, respectively. Long-term discrimination (assessed from carbon isotope composition of leaf dry matter) did not correlate well with these short- term measures of discrimination. We suggest that this may be due to differences between species in fractionations occurring after photosynthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
C4 photosynthesis and water stress.
Ghannoum, O. (2008) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn093 · Cited by 538
Fryer, M. J., Andrews, J. R., Oxborough, K., Blowers, D. A., & Baker, N. R. (1998) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.116.2.571 · Cited by 443
Carbon Dioxide Diffusion inside Leaves
Evans, J. R., & von Caemmerer, S. (1996) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.2.339 · Cited by 408
The C4 pathway: an efficient CO2 pump
von Caemmerer, S., & Furbank, R. T. (2003) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025830019591 · Cited by 406
Discrimination between12C and13C by marine plants
Maberly, S. C., Raven, J. A., & Johnston, A. M. (1992) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00650320 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, S., Caemmerer, S., & Farquhar, G.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-285
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2329697427
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-Term Measurements of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Several C4 Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9920263
- The paper
- Henderson, S., Caemmerer, S., & Farquhar, G. (1992). Short-Term Measurements of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Several C4 Species. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9920263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.