The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Global Carbon Cycle: a Viewpoint on the Missing Sink
Abstract
Atmospheric carbon budgets that ignore the possibility of terrestrial ecosystem responses to global atmospheric change do not balance; there is a 'missing sink' of about 0.4 - 4 Gt C yr-1. This paper argues a case that mechanistically it is well within the bounds of possibility that increasing carbon storage in vegetation and soils in response to the globally increasing CO2 concentration, temperature and nitrogen deposition can account for the missing C sink. Global warming conditions considered alone would be unlikely to cause most ecosystems to emit CO2, because the N mineralised by any enhanced soil organic matter decomposition would be largely taken up by plants and reconverted into organic matter having a much higher C:N ratio than that in the soil. Models of the global terrestrial C cycle indicate that an extra 0.5 - 4 Gt C yr-1 could well be being stored in soils and vegetation today in response to the CO2 fertilising effect, having regard for the interactions with growth restricting water, light and nitrogen levels. To obtain direct proof as to whether that this is happening or not is a major challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?
Drake, B. G., Gonzàlez-Meler, M. A., & Long, S. P. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609 · Cited by 1,925
Increased soil emissions of potent greenhouse gases under increased atmospheric CO2
van Groenigen, K. J., Osenberg, C. W., & Hungate, B. A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10176 · Cited by 551
Ryan, M. G., Hubbard, R. M., Pongracic, S., Raison, R. J., & McMurtrie, R. E. (1996) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/16.3.333 · Cited by 544
Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth
MORISON, J. I. L., & LAWLOR, D. W. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00443.x · Cited by 509
AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CAUSES OF FOREST GROWTH DECLINE WITH STAND AGE
Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D., Fownes, J. H., Giardina, C. P., & Senock, R. S. (2004) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/03-4037 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Gifford, R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1994-02-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2325440268
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Global Carbon Cycle: a Viewpoint on the Missing Sink. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9940001
- The paper
- Gifford, R. (1994). The Global Carbon Cycle: a Viewpoint on the Missing Sink. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9940001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.