Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Global Carbon Cycle: a Viewpoint on the Missing Sink

Gifford, RM·1994·Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Abstract

Atmospheric carbon budgets that ignore the possibility of terrestrial ecosystem responses to global atmospheric change do not balance; there is a 'missing sink' of about 0.4 - 4 Gt C yr-1. This paper argues a case that mechanistically it is well within the bounds of possibility that increasing carbon storage in vegetation and soils in response to the globally increasing CO2 concentration, temperature and nitrogen deposition can account for the missing C sink. Global warming conditions considered alone would be unlikely to cause most ecosystems to emit CO2, because the N mineralised by any enhanced soil organic matter decomposition would be largely taken up by plants and reconverted into organic matter having a much higher C:N ratio than that in the soil. Models of the global terrestrial C cycle indicate that an extra 0.5 - 4 Gt C yr-1 could well be being stored in soils and vegetation today in response to the CO2 fertilising effect, having regard for the interactions with growth restricting water, light and nitrogen levels. To obtain direct proof as to whether that this is happening or not is a major challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/pp9940001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Gifford, R.
Venue
Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
Published
1994-02-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-5655
OpenAlex
W2325440268
Cited by
334
References
0
FWCI
41.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Global Carbon Cycle: a Viewpoint on the Missing Sink. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9940001
The paper
Gifford, R. (1994). The Global Carbon Cycle: a Viewpoint on the Missing Sink. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9940001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.