Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensitivity of Wheat Phasic Development to Major Environmental Factors: a Re-Examination of Some Assumptions Made by Physiologists and Modellers

Slafer, GA, Rawson, HM·1994·Functional Plant Biology

Abstract

In this review we assess the universality of several assumptions that are commonly made about development in wheat. The assumptions tested are that: (1) wheat is most sensitive to the environmental variables of temperature and photoperiod during the vegetative period; (2) any responses to vernalisation and photoperiod are complete by the time that the apex has become reproductive and the stems begin to elongate; (3) cultivars differ little in their responses to temperature aside from any responses to vernalisation; (4) cultivar differences in 'intrinsic earliness' or 'basic development rate' are unaffected by temperature; (5) photoperiod and vernalisation responses are quantitative and that these responses are well understood and can be generalised. We show that, in terms of development, all wheats are responsive to temperature throughout their life cycles though to differing degrees, most are responsive to photoperiod at least until heading and, contrary to expectations, with potentially increasing sensitivity once the flowering process is triggered, and many are responsive to a memory of vernalising temperatures to well beyond the double ridge stage. In all these responses we show that there is considerable genotypic variation and that it is usually difficult to guess the responses of one genotype to the main environmental variables from the responses of another. This is partially because overall sensitivity to each of the main variables can differ, and the responses can be interactive, but also because the primary responses and interactions can differ between developmental phases. This can result in a high level of complexity of response whenever any variable is changed. The level of complexity is a negative feature when it comes to modelling and forecasting responses across widely differing environments but a highly positive feature when considering the enormous genotypic variation available for selection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/pp9940393

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Slafer, G., & Rawson, H.
Venue
Functional Plant Biology
Published
1994
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
393
ISSN
1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324376194
Cited by
481
References
0
FWCI
19.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of Wheat Phasic Development to Major Environmental Factors: a Re-Examination of Some Assumptions Made by Physiologists and Modellers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9940393
The paper
Slafer, G., & Rawson, H. (1994). Sensitivity of Wheat Phasic Development to Major Environmental Factors: a Re-Examination of Some Assumptions Made by Physiologists and Modellers. Functional Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9940393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.