The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breeding for Salinity Resistance in Crop Plants: Where Next?
Open accessAbstract
Soil salinity is widely reported to be a major agricultural problem, particularly in irrigated agriculture, and research on salinity in plants has produced a vast literature. However, there are only a handful of instances where cultivars have been developed which are resistant to saline soils. Reasons for the lack of success in developing salt-resistant genotypes, and for the low impact that plant physiological research has made, are explored. We conclude that soil salinity has not yet become a sufficient agricultural problem, other than on a local scale, to make salt resistance a high priority objective for plant breeders. The limited success of simple selection, where this has been practised in breeding programs, can be accounted for by the fact that research has consistently shown salt resistance is a complex character controlled by a number of genes or groups of genes and involves a number of component traits which are likely to be quantitative in nature. We also conclude that the results of physiological research have been poorly marketed by physiologists and, understandably, have failed to impress plant breeders. We anticipate that the importance of salinity as a breeding objective will increase in the future. Our assessment of reports of the degradation of irrigation systems, together with projections of the future demands of irrigated agriculture, is that enhancing the salt resistance of at least some crops will be necessary. Salinity resistance will both help provide stability of yield in subsistence agriculture and, through moderating inputs, help limit salinisation in irrigation systems with inadequate drainage. It is emphasised that plant improvement and drainage engineering should be seen as partners and not alternatives. We conclude with a personal view of one way forward for developing salt-resistant genotypes, through the pyramiding of physiological characters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development
Khan, W., Rayirath, U. P., Subramanian, S., Jithesh, M. N., Rayorath, P., Hodges, D. M., Critchley, A. T., Craigie, J. S., Norrie, J., & Prithiviraj, B. (2009) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x · Cited by 1,740
Roy, S. J., Negrão, S., & Tester, M. (2014) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.12.004 · Cited by 1,163
Calcium signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana responding to drought and salinity
Knight, H., Trewavas, A. J., & Knight, M. R. (1997) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12051067.x · Cited by 915
Plant salt tolerance: adaptations in halophytes
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu267 · Cited by 835
Self-citationYokoi, S., Quintero, F. J., Cubero, B., Ruiz, M. T., Bressan, R. A., Hasegawa, P. M., & Pardo, J. M. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01309.x · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Flowers, T., & Yeo, A.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 875-884
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2032521982
- Cited by
- 984
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding for Salinity Resistance in Crop Plants: Where Next? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9950875
- The paper
- Flowers, T., & Yeo, A. (1995). Breeding for Salinity Resistance in Crop Plants: Where Next? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9950875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.