The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model for follicle selection and the determination of ovulation rate in the ewe
Abstract
A model for folliculogenesis is proposed that is based as far as possible on a knowledge of physiological, rather than anatomical, changes taking place during follicle development. The model is therefore functional, rather than descriptive, and consists of five classes of follicles that have been defined by their dependency and sensitivity to gonadotrophins. These classes are: primordial, committed, gonadotrophin-responsive, gonadotrophin-dependent and ovulatory. The model is an attempt to encourage discussion and to promote the integration of morphological models of folliculogenesis with recent advances in the molecular endocrinology of the ovarian follicle. Two hypotheses for the mechanisms that determine ovulation rate are developed in light of the model. In the first, multiple ovulation results when the viability of gonadotropin-dependent follicles is enhanced. In the second, multiple ovulation is caused by increasing the number of gonadotrophin-responsive follicles available for further development; this results from the increasing rate of folliculogenesis and the throughput of follicles. The final section of this paper examines how these two hypothetical mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, appear to account for most of the known genetical and environmental effects on ovulation rate of sheep. In particular, the effects of nutrition, genotype, exogenous gonadotrophins, immunity to both oestrogens and androgens, and immunity to inhibin are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pituitary control of ovarian function–concepts derived from gonadotrophin therapy
Brown, J. B. (1978) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1978.tb00011.x · Cited by 320
Cited by
Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles
McGee, E. A., & Hsueh, A. J. W. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.2.0394 · Cited by 1,771
Manipulation of Human Ovarian Function: Physiological Concepts and Clinical Consequences*
Fauser, B. C. J. M., & van Heusden, A. M. (1997) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.18.1.0290 · Cited by 509
Regulation of folliculogenesis and the determination of ovulation rate in ruminants
Scaramuzzi, R. J., Baird, D. T., Campbell, B. K., Driancourt, M.-A., Dupont, J., Fortune, J. E., Gilchrist, R. B., Martin, G. B., McNatty, K. P., McNeilly, A. S., et al. (2011) · Reproduction, Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd09161 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Scaramuzzi, R., Adams, N., Baird, D., Campbell, B., Downing, J., Findlay, J., Henderson, K., Martin, G., McNatty, K., McNeilly, A., & Tsonis, C.
- Venue
- Reproduction, Fertility and Development
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 459-478
- ISSN
- 1031-3613 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5990
- OpenAlex
- W2091961436
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model for follicle selection and the determination of ovulation rate in the ewe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/rd9930459
- The paper
- Scaramuzzi, R., Adams, N., Baird, D., Campbell, B., Downing, J., Findlay, J., Henderson, K., Martin, G., McNatty, K., McNeilly, A., & Tsonis, C. (1993). A model for follicle selection and the determination of ovulation rate in the ewe. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd9930459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.