Sperm recovery techniques to maximize fertilizing capacity

Abstract

Because seminal plasma contains factors that inhibit the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa, it is essential that spermatozoa be separated from it quickly and efficiently. Although the success of a sperm preparation method is often assessed by the yield of motile spermatozoa, the choice of a method also depends on its technical complexity, the materials and apparatus required and time costs. Any exposure of spermatozoa during preparation to factors that may cause iatrogenic sperm dysfunction must obviously be avoided. Consequently, methods involving centrifugal washing prior to the selection of motile spermatozoa should be avoided. Direct swim-up from semen is the simplest way to obtain highly motile sperm populations and can be a very rapid procedure with normal semen samples. Two-layer discontinuous Percoll gradients give excellent yields when the lower layer contains 81% (v/v) Percoll. However, for severely asthenozoospermic cases the results can be disappointing and a Nycodenz gradient may be better, although the 'mini-Percoll' technique might be useful if special care is taken to protect the spermatozoa from damage induced by free radicals. In such cases the migration-sedimentation approach can also be successful. Abnormal samples, especially those with increased viscosity, may benefit from prior dilution with culture medium, or even chymotrypsin-induced liquefaction, before density gradient centrifugation. Finally, pharmacological stimulation of sperm motility may increase yields but, for in vitro fertilization (IVF), such spermatozoa must be used to inseminate oocytes as soon as possible after exposure to the stimulant, although after its removal.