Soil carbon changes resulting from sugarcane trash management at two locations in Queensland, Australia, and in North-East Brazil
Abstract
Sugarcane cropping produces a large amount of crop residues, which offers considerable scope for residue management. Soil samples, collected from 2 long-term experiments in Australia and an experiment in Pernambuco State, Brazil, were analysed for total carbon (CT) and for labile carbon (CL) by oxidation with 333 mM KMnO4. At the 2 locations in Australia, CT and CL concentrations were lower in the surface layer (0-1 cm) of the cropped soil compared with a nearby uncropped reference soil. Burning resulted in a greater loss in CT and CL at a depth of 0-1 cm than green cane trash management. At one of the sites, sugarcane cropping resulted in a decline in CT relative to the reference in the green trash management treatment but an increase in CL. In Brazil, trash management from one cane crop did not change CT over a 12-month period but green cane trash return increased CL. Sustainable sugarcane cropping systems must include crop residue return without burning in order to maintain an active C cycle in the system to drive nutrient cycles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In sugarcane, fields burned before harvest have lower SOC than unburned fields where harvest residue is retained.
“In the case of sugarcane, fields burned before harvest have lower SOC than unburned fields where the harvest residue is retained on the fields (Blair et al., 1998;Graham et al., 2002), and our models likewise revealed that retention of harvest residue resulted in faster SOC accumulation (Tables B1 and B2).”
From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Blair et al., 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haynes, R. J. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)85005-3 · Cited by 1,010 · see citing works
Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops
ANDERSON‐TEIXEIRA, K. J., DAVIS, S. C., MASTERS, M. D., & DELUCIA, E. H. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x · Cited by 391 · see citing works
SILVA, A., RIBEIRO, M., CARVALHO, F., SILVA, V, & SILVA, L. (2007) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2006.09.002 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blair, G. J., Chapman, L., Whitbread, A. M., Ball-Coelho, B., Larsen, P., & Tiessen, H.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1998-11-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 873-882
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W2014551651
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- soil carbon, labile carbon, crop residue burning, soil oxidation, Queensland, Pernambuco
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review