Cited by 8Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Lower sexually transmissible infection prevalence among lifetime exclusive women who have sex with women compared with women who have sex with women and men.

Muzny, Christina A., Kapil, Richa, Austin, Erika L., Hook, Edward W., Geisler, William M.·2014·Sexual Health

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Background Sexually transmissible infection (STI) history, prevalence and seroprevalence among lifetime exclusive women who have sex with women (WSW) and an age-matched group of women who have sex with women and men (WSWM) was evaluated. METHODS: Participants completed a study questionnaire and had genital specimens and sera collected for STI testing. RESULTS: Twenty-one lifetime exclusive WSW and 42 WSWM were included. WSWM were more likely to report a history of prior STIs and be seropositive for chlamydia and HSV-2. Prevalent STIs were less common among WSW. CONCLUSIONS: While lifetime exclusive WSW are at risk of contracting STIs, WSWM are disproportionally affected. Healthcare providers should consider routine STI screening among WSW.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sh14181

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies indicate that WSW might experience STIs at lower rates than WSWM and WSM, although still at significant rates.

    “These studies indicate that WSW might experience STIs at lower rates than WSWM and WSM, although still at significant rates (287).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [287]

  • HSV-2 seroprevalence among women self-identifying as homosexual or lesbian was 8%, similar to a previous clinic-based study of WSW but was 26% among Black WSW in one study.

    “HSV-2 seroprevalence among women self-identifying as homosexual or lesbian was 8%, similar to a previous clinic-based study of WSW (299,305) but was 26% among Black WSW in one study (287).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [287]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 8

Authors
Muzny, C. A., Kapil, R., Austin, E. L., Hook, E. W., & Geisler, W. M.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Muzny, Christina A.
Venue
Sexual Health
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
592-593
ISSN
  • 1448-5028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-8987
OpenAlex
W2017457629
Cited by
8
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Arkansas
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
sexually transmitted infections, women who have sex with women, chlamydia, herpes simplex virus type 2, STI screening, sexual minority women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review