The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of the effects of wastewater sodium on soil physical properties and their implications for irrigation systems
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews the effects of wastewater sodium on soil physical properties, particularly with respect to irrigation systems. Fundamental sodicity concepts are examined including ( i ) sodicity definitions, ( ii ) the effects of sodium on soil properties, ( iii ) a discussion of factors that impede the infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity, ( iv ) the changes that occur in ionic strength of percolating water in soil, and ( v ) consideration of the wastewater and soil constituents that modify the effective sodium adsorption ratio. Importantly, the ability for soils to assimilate wastewater over time changes, but these changes are not often considered prior to the planning of such irrigation systems, or after the irrigation systems are operating. The general lack of understanding of sodicity is in part due to the considerable variation in sodicity definitions. Exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) values that are reported to pose a sodicity problem vary around the world due to the different mineralogy of the soils investigated, but variations in threshold ESP values have also been caused by a lack of consideration of the solution electrolyte concentration when determining ESP. In practice, the effects of sodicity may be evident in soils that are well under reported threshold values. When the effects of sodicity are identified, the landholder at least has the opportunity to implement remediation practices. However, more often than not, the effects of sodium from irrigation water are latent, leading to considerable problems following the cessation of effluent irrigation and changed land use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soriano-Disla, J. M., Janik, L. J., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Macdonald, L. M., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2014) · Applied Spectroscopy Reviews · doi:10.1080/05704928.2013.811081 · Cited by 848
Reuse of effluent water—benefits and risks
Toze, S. (2006) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.010 · Cited by 698
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: a Review of its Applications and Health Implications
Kesari, K. K., Soni, R., Jamal, Q. M. S., Tripathi, P., Lal, J. A., Jha, N. K., Siddiqui, M. H., Kumar, P., Tripathi, V., & Ruokolainen, J. (2021) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-021-05154-8 · Cited by 638
Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: A Review about Its Limitations and Benefits
Jaramillo, M., & Restrepo, I. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101734 · Cited by 521
Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils
Qadir, M., & Schubert, S. (2002) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.504 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Halliwell, D. J., Barlow, K. M., & Nash, D. M.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2001-11-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1259-1267
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W1619055124
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the effects of wastewater sodium on soil physical properties and their implications for irrigation systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr00047
- The paper
- Halliwell, D. J., Barlow, K. M., & Nash, D. M. (2001). A review of the effects of wastewater sodium on soil physical properties and their implications for irrigation systems. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr00047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.