The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure
Abstract
Quirk and Schofield (1955) in their paper on the effect of electrolyte concentration on soil permeability in relation to sodicity designated 2 concentrations: the threshold concentration , which related to the first discernible effect on soil structure; and the turbidity concentration , at which the dismantling of the soil microstructure is indicated by the appearance of dispersed particles in the percolate—this occurs when the electrolyte concentration is about one-quarter of the threshold concentration. This behaviour is explained in terms of clay domains , which are assemblages of many clay particles in parallel alignment. Within a clay domain, slit-shaped pores with surface separations about equal to the thickness of clay crystals exist. When calcium is the dominant exchangeable ion the clay domains are stable because where contiguous crystals overlap the surfaces reside in a potential well as a result of strong attractive forces. These attractive forces are similar to those responsible for the stability of Camontmorillonite and Ca-vermiculite crystals. A model of 3 clay crystals is used to illustrate how crystal interaction within a clay domain, in terms of classical repulsive diffuse double-layer forces and modern attractive forces, affect domain stability. Attention is drawn to a misconception, now prevalent in the literature, which does not recognise the basic significance of the turbidity concentration with respect to microstructure and wrongly contends that the concentration of electrolyte required to effect the dispersion to flocculation transition in soil suspensions can be used for predicting the level of electrolyte required to sustain soil permeability or infiltration rate in irrigation practice. It is shown that the flocculation concentration is almost 8 times the turbidity concentration. The application of the threshold concentration concept in irrigation practice is discussed. It is demonstrated that the threshold and turbidity concentration comfortably explain the behaviour of a heavy clay soil subjected to border-check irrigation and Cajon sandy loam in Arizona.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils
Qadir, M., & Schubert, S. (2002) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.504 · Cited by 489
Salt-affected soils, reclamation, carbon dynamics, and biochar: a review
Amini, S., Ghadiri, H., Chen, C., & Marschner, P. (2016) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1293-1 · Cited by 420
Productivity enhancement of salt‐affected environments through crop diversification
Qadir, M., Tubeileh, A., Akhtar, J., Larbi, A., Minhas, P. S., & Khan, M. A. (2008) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.853 · Cited by 306
Municipal solid waste (MSW): strategies to improve salt affected soil sustainability: a review
Meena, M. D., Yadav, R. K., Narjary, B., Yadav, G., Jat, H. S., Sheoran, P., Meena, M. K., Antil, R. S., Meena, B. L., Singh, H. V., et al. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.020 · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- Quirk, J. P.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2001-11-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1185-1217
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W2146314911
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr00050
- The paper
- Quirk, J. P. (2001). The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr00050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.