Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure

Quirk, J. P.·2001·Australian Journal of Soil Research

Abstract

Quirk and Schofield (1955) in their paper on the effect of electrolyte concentration on soil permeability in relation to sodicity designated 2 concentrations: the threshold concentration , which related to the first discernible effect on soil structure; and the turbidity concentration , at which the dismantling of the soil microstructure is indicated by the appearance of dispersed particles in the percolate—this occurs when the electrolyte concentration is about one-quarter of the threshold concentration. This behaviour is explained in terms of clay domains , which are assemblages of many clay particles in parallel alignment. Within a clay domain, slit-shaped pores with surface separations about equal to the thickness of clay crystals exist. When calcium is the dominant exchangeable ion the clay domains are stable because where contiguous crystals overlap the surfaces reside in a potential well as a result of strong attractive forces. These attractive forces are similar to those responsible for the stability of Camontmorillonite and Ca-vermiculite crystals. A model of 3 clay crystals is used to illustrate how crystal interaction within a clay domain, in terms of classical repulsive diffuse double-layer forces and modern attractive forces, affect domain stability. Attention is drawn to a misconception, now prevalent in the literature, which does not recognise the basic significance of the turbidity concentration with respect to microstructure and wrongly contends that the concentration of electrolyte required to effect the dispersion to flocculation transition in soil suspensions can be used for predicting the level of electrolyte required to sustain soil permeability or infiltration rate in irrigation practice. It is shown that the flocculation concentration is almost 8 times the turbidity concentration. The application of the threshold concentration concept in irrigation practice is discussed. It is demonstrated that the threshold and turbidity concentration comfortably explain the behaviour of a heavy clay soil subjected to border-check irrigation and Cajon sandy loam in Arizona.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sr00050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Quirk, J. P.
Venue
Australian Journal of Soil Research
Published
2001-11-28
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1185-1217
ISSN
  • 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-568X
OpenAlex
W2146314911
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
28.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr00050
The paper
Quirk, J. P. (2001). The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr00050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.