Cited by 103Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPasture and Agricultural SystemsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Soil carbon stocks under different pastures and pasture management in the higher rainfall areas of south-eastern Australia

Chan, K. Y., Oates, A., Li, G. D., Conyers, M. K., Prangnell, R. J., Poile, G., Liu, D. L., Barchia, I. M.·2010·Soil Research

Abstract

In Australia, pastures form the basis of the extensive livestock industries and are important components of crop rotation systems. Despite recent interest in the soil carbon sequestration value of pastures in the mitigation of climate change, little information is available on the soil carbon sequestration potential of pastures in New South Wales farming systems. To quantify the soil carbon stocks under different pastures and a range of pasture management practices, a field survey of soil carbon stocks was undertaken in 2007 in central and southern NSW as well as north-eastern Victoria, using a paired-site approach. Five comparisons were included: native v. introduced perennial, perennial v. annual, continuous v. rotational grazing, pasture cropping v. control, and improved v. unimproved pastures. Results indicated a wide range of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks over 0-0.30m (22.4-66.3tC/ha), with little difference when calculated based on either constant soil depth or constant soil mass. Significantly higher SOC stocks were found only as a result of pasture improvement using P application compared with unimproved pastures. In this case, rates of sequestration were estimated to range between 0.26 and 0.72tC/ha.year, with a mean rate of 0.41tC/ha.year. Lack of significant differences in SOC stocks for the other pastures and pasture management practice comparisons could be due to inherent problems associated with the paired-site survey approach, i.e. large variability, difficu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sr09092

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chan et al. [28] found significantly higher SOC stocks in native and introduced pastures which had been improved with phosphorus often associated with the addition of legumes (grazing management controlled for).

    “Chan et al. [28] found significantly higher SOC stocks in native and introduced pastures which had been improved with phosphorus often associated with the addition of legumes (grazing management controlled for), but no significant differences in SOC between rotational and continuous grazing management in central and southern NSW.”
  • The variance around that mean value was large and in many individual studies the data were insignificantly different between management categories.

    “However, the variance around that mean value was large and in many individual studies the data were insignificantly different between management categories [27], [28], [29].”
  • Chan et al. [28] found no significant differences in SOC between rotational and continuous grazing management in central and southern NSW.

    “Chan et al. [28] found significantly higher SOC stocks in native and introduced pastures which had been improved with phosphorus often associated with the addition of legumes (grazing management controlled for), but no significant differences in SOC between rotational and continuous grazing management in central and southern NSW.”
  • The scientific literature is mixed on SOC responses to rotational grazing: some studies show positive responses, many show no significant difference, and a few suggest a slight negative response.

    “The scientific literature is decidedly mixed with some studies showing positive SOC responses to rotational grazing (e.g. [56], [57]), many showing no significant difference (e.g. [28], [29]) and a few suggesting a slight negative SOC response (e.g. [27], [58]).”
  • The inherent variability in SOC within paddocks and across small regions makes detecting small but real improvements in SOC difficult.

    “As seen in this study and others [28], [29], the inherent variability in SOC within paddocks and across small regions makes detecting small but real improvements in SOC difficult.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, K. Y., Oates, A., Li, G. D., Conyers, M. K., Prangnell, R. J., Poile, G., Liu, D. L., & Barchia, I. M.
Affiliations
  • AE.H. Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
  • CIndustry & Investment NSW, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, PMB 8, Menangle, NSW 2570, Australia.
Corresponding author
Chan, K. Y.
Venue
Soil Research
Published
2010-02-26
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
7-15
ISSN
  • 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
  • 1838-675X
  • 1838-6768
OpenAlex
W2005718424
Cited by
103
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSW Department of Primary Industries
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon stocks, soil carbon sequestration, pasture, pasture management, rotational grazing, continuous grazing, pasture improvement, phosphorus fertilization, native perennial grasses, annual grasses, New South Wales, south-eastern Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review