What determines soil organic carbon stocks in the grazing lands of north-eastern Australia?
Abstract
This study aimed to unravel the effects of climate, topography, soil, and grazing management on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in the grazing lands of north-eastern Australia. We sampled for SOC stocks at 98 sites from 18 grazing properties across Queensland, Australia. These samples covered four nominal grazing management classes (Continuous, Rotational, Cell, and Exclosure), eight broad soil types, and a strong tropical to subtropical climatic gradient. Temperature and vapour-pressure deficit explained >80% of the variability of SOC stocks at cumulative equivalent mineral masses nominally representing 0–0.1 and 0–0.3 m depths. Once detrended of climatic effects, SOC stocks were strongly influenced by total standing dry matter, soil type, and the dominant grass species. At 0–0.3 m depth only, there was a weak negative association between stocking rate and climate-detrended SOC stocks, and Cell grazing was associated with smaller SOC stocks than Continuous grazing and Exclosure. In future, collection of quantitative information on stocking intensity, frequency, and duration may help to improve understanding of the effect of grazing management on SOC stocks. Further exploration of the links between grazing management and above- and below-ground biomass, perhaps inferred through remote sensing and/or simulation modelling, may assist large-area mapping of SOC stocks in northern Australia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The scientific literature is mixed on SOC responses to rotational grazing: some studies show positive responses, many show no significant difference, and a few suggest a slight negative response.
“The scientific literature is decidedly mixed with some studies showing positive SOC responses to rotational grazing (e.g. [56], [57]), many showing no significant difference (e.g. [28], [29]) and a few suggesting a slight negative SOC response (e.g. [27], [58]).”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Allen et al. [27] found a small negative influence of stocking rate on SOC stocks.
“Allen et al. [27] found a small negative influence of stocking rate on SOC stocks but no significant differences between grazing management styles in the rangelands of Queensland.”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Allen et al. [27] found no significant differences between grazing management styles in the rangelands of Queensland.
“Allen et al. [27] found a small negative influence of stocking rate on SOC stocks but no significant differences between grazing management styles in the rangelands of Queensland.”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
The variance around that mean value was large and in many individual studies the data were insignificantly different between management categories.
“However, the variance around that mean value was large and in many individual studies the data were insignificantly different between management categories [27], [28], [29].”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia
Sanderman, J., Reseigh, J., Wurst, M., Young, M.-A., & Austin, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allen, D. E., Pringle, M. J., Bray, S., Hall, T. J., O’Reagain, P. O., Phelps, D., Cobon, D. H., Bloesch, P. M., & Dalal, R. C.
- Affiliations
- ALandscape Sciences (ESP), Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, GPO Box 5078, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
- Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- CScience Engagement, Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
- Corresponding author
- Allen, D. E.
- Venue
- Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2013-12-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 695-706
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1838-675X
- 1838-6768
- OpenAlex
- W2082573741
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 12.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Research (publishedVersion)
- Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- soil organic carbon stocks, pasture, grazing management, rotational grazing, exclosures, continuous grazing, climate effects, vapor pressure deficit, topography, soil type, grass species, stocking rate, north-eastern Australia, Queensland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review