Cited by 9Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Geostatistics and MappingSoil erosion and sediment transport

Combining management based indices with environmental parameters to explain regional variation in soil carbon under dryland cropping in South Australia

Macdonald, Lynne M., Herrmann, Tim, Baldock, Jeffrey A.·2013·Soil Research

Abstract

Identifying drivers of variation in soil organic carbon (OC) at a regional scale is often hampered by a lack of historical management information. Focusing on red-brown-earth soils (Chromosol) under dryland agriculture in the Mid-North and Eyre Peninsula of South Australia, our aims were 2-fold: (i) to provide a baseline of soil OC stocks (0.3 m) and OC fractions (mid-infrared predictions of particulate, humus, and resistant OC in 0.1 m samples) in cropping and crop-pasture systems; and (ii) to evaluate whether the inclusion of management-based indices could assist in explaining regional-level variation in OC stocks and fractions. Soil OC stocks in both regions varied ~20 Mg ha–1, with higher OC stocks in the Mid-North (38 Mg ha–1) than the Eyre Peninsula (29.1 Mg ha–1). The humus OC fraction was the dominant fraction, while the particulate OC was the most variable. Environmental variables only partially explained soil OC variability, with vapour pressure deficit (VPD) offering the greatest potential and likely acting as an integrator of temperature and moisture on plant growth and decomposition processes. Differences between broad-scale cropping and crop–pasture systems were limited. In the Mid-North, variability in soil OC stocks and fractions was high, and could not be explained by environmental or management variables. Higher soil OC concentrations (0.1 m) in the Eyre Peninsula cropping than crop–pasture soils were largely accounted for in the particulate OC fraction and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sr13156

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treating all sites as equal within each of the two main management categories may be masking real differences in the dependent variable.

    “Additionally, an important finding from this study was that there was a large range of grazing intensities within each management category (Fig 2) and treating all sites as equal within each of the two main categories may be masking real differences in the dependent variable [59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macdonald, L. M., Herrmann, T., & Baldock, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Government of South Australia (AU)
  • ACSIRO Sustainable Agriculture Flagship.
Corresponding author
Macdonald, Lynne M.
Venue
Soil Research
Published
2013-12-20
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
738-747
ISSN
  • 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
  • 1838-675X
  • 1838-6768
OpenAlex
W2171575416
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fisheries Research and Development Corporation
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon, soil organic carbon stocks, soil organic carbon fractions, particulate organic carbon, vapor pressure deficit, dryland cropping, regional variation, South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review