Effects of amendment of different biochars on soil enzyme activities related to carbon mineralisation
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of different biochars on soil enzyme activities associated with soil carbon (C) mineralisation. Biochars were produced from two types of feedstock (fresh dairy manure and pine tree woodchip) at temperatures of 300°C, 500°C, and 700°C. Each biochar was mixed at a ratio of 5% (w/w) with a forest loamy soil and the mixture was incubated at 25°C for 180 days. Soil mineralisation rates, soil dissolved organic C, soil microbial biomass C, and five soil enzyme activities were measured during different incubation periods. Results showed that biochar addition increased soil enzyme activities at the early stage (mainly within the first 80 days) because biochar brought available nutrients to the soil and increased soil dissolved organic C and microbial activity. Soil enzyme activities were enhanced more by the dairy manure biochars than by the woodchip biochars (P < 0.05). The enhancement effect on enzyme activities (except catalase activity) was greater in the treatments with biochars produced at lower pyrolysis temperature (300°C). Linear relationships between some soil enzymes and C-mineralisation rates might indicate that the increased enzyme activities stimulated soil C mineralisation at the early stage. However, the biochar additions could result in great C sequestration in the long term, especially for the woodchip biochars pyrolysed at higher temperatures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A positive effect of biochar amendment has been observed in soil enzymatic activity, which is an indicator of higher soil quality.
“Also, a positive effect of biochar amendment has been observed in soil enzymatic activity, which is an indicator of higher soil quality (Mierzwa-Hersztek et al. 2016;Ouyang et al. 2014).”
From Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects (2020) · cites this paper as Ouyang et al. 2014
Biochar showed positive impacts on soil enzymatic activities.
“Biochar showed positive impacts on soil enzymatic activities (Mierzwa-Hersztek et al. 2016;Ouyang et al. 2014).”
From Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant (2020) · cites this paper as Ouyang et al. 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Ouyang, L., Tang, Q., Yu, L., & Zhang, R.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Renduo
- Venue
- Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2014-08-29
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 706-716
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1838-675X
- 1838-6768
- OpenAlex
- W2005139882
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Research (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biochar amendment, soil enzyme activity, soil carbon mineralization, pyrolysis temperature, soil dissolved organic carbon, soil microbial biomass carbon, carbon sequestration, catalase activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review