The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Australian three-dimensional soil grid: Australia’s contribution to the GlobalSoilMap project
Open accessAbstract
Information on the geographic variation in soil has traditionally been presented in polygon (choropleth) maps at coarse scales. Now scientists, planners, managers and politicians want quantitative information on the variation and functioning of soil at finer resolutions; they want it to plan better land use for agriculture, water supply and the mitigation of climate change land degradation and desertification. The GlobalSoilMap project aims to produce a grid of soil attributes at a fine spatial resolution (approximately 100 m), and at six depths, for the purpose. This paper describes the three-dimensional spatial modelling used to produce the Australian soil grid, which consists of Australia-wide soil attribute maps. The modelling combines historical soil data plus estimates derived from visible and infrared soil spectra. Together they provide a good coverage of data across Australia. The soil attributes so far include sand, silt and clay contents, bulk density, available water capacity, organic carbon, pH, effective cation exchange capacity, total phosphorus and total nitrogen. The data on these attributes were harmonised to six depth layers, namely 0–0.05 m, 0.05–0.15 m, 0.15–0.30 m, 0.30–0.60 m, 0.60–1.00 m and 1.00–2.00 m, and the resulting values were incorporated simultaneously in the models. The modelling itself combined the bootstrap, a decision tree with piecewise regression on environmental variables and geostatistical modelling of residuals. At each layer, values of the soil attributes were predicted at the nodes of a 3 arcsecond (approximately 90 m) grid and mapped together with their uncertainties. The assessment statistics for each attribute mapped show that the models explained between 30% and 70% of their total variation. The outcomes are illustrated with maps of sand, silt and clay contents and their uncertainties. The Australian three-dimensional soil maps fill a significant gap in the availability of quantitative soil information in Australia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., et al. (2007) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2005rg000183 · Cited by 8,927
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
Lin, L. I.-K. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532051 · Cited by 8,785
McBratney, A. B., Mendonça Santos, M. L., & Minasny, B. (2003) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(03)00223-4 · Cited by 3,651
Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E., & Gómez-Rubio, V. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7618-4 · Cited by 3,206
The Australian Soil Classification
National Committee on Soil and Terrain, & Isbell, R. (2016) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9781486304646 · Cited by 2,537
Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s65 · Cited by 2,458
Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis
Moore, I. D., Gessler, P. E., Nielsen, G. A., & Peterson, G. A. (1993) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020026x · Cited by 1,449
Cited by
Machine learning for digital soil mapping: Applications, challenges and suggested solutions
Wadoux, A. M. J.-C., Minasny, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103359 · Cited by 731
Mapping high resolution National Soil Information Grids of China
Liu, F., Wu, H., Zhao, Y., Li, D., Yang, J.-L., Song, X., Shi, Z., Zhu, A.-X., & Zhang, G.-L. (2022) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.013 · Cited by 639
Selecting appropriate machine learning methods for digital soil mapping
Khaledian, Y., & Miller, B. A. (2020) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2019.12.016 · Cited by 448
Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates
Nussbaum, M., Spiess, K., Baltensweiler, A., Grob, U., Keller, A., Greiner, L., Schaepman, M. E., & Papritz, A. (2018) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-4-1-2018 · Cited by 304
Soil sensing: A new paradigm for agriculture
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., & Bouma, J. (2016) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.001 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Chen, C., Grundy, M. J., Searle, R., Clifford, D., & Campbell, P. H.
- Venue
- Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2015-09-25
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 845-864
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1838-675X
- 1838-6768
- OpenAlex
- W1891744174
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Australian three-dimensional soil grid: Australia’s contribution to the GlobalSoilMap project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr14366
- The paper
- Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Chen, C., Grundy, M. J., Searle, R., Clifford, D., & Campbell, P. H. (2015). The Australian three-dimensional soil grid: Australia’s contribution to the GlobalSoilMap project. Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr14366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.