Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The role of termites and ants in soil modification - a review

Lobry de Bruyn, LA, Conacher, AJ·1990·Australian Journal of Soil Research

Abstract

The review examines the literature concerning the effects on soil profile development of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and termites (Isoptera), two prominent insect groups in the Australian environment. Their pedological influence is largely through the construction of nests, galleries, soil sheetings and mounds. Some of the pedological effects are manifested in the physical modification of the soil profile through selecting, transporting and rearranging soil particles. Within this group, findings in areas such as soil turnover, mound longevity, bioturbation, soil structure and water infiltration are discussed. Termites contribute actively to soil turnover, and the contribution of termite sheetings and ant mounds to soil turnover is also being recognized. Termite mounds may persist in the landscape for more than two decades, while ant mound longevity varies from weeks to decades. Information on the effects of ants and termites on soil structure and water infiltration is sparse; but ants and termites seem to either increase infiltration by improving soil structure and porosity, or to decrease infiltration by producing compact surfaces which assist runoff and erosion. Other effects involve the chemical alteration of the soil profile by ants and termites collecting and transporting live and dead animal and plant materials to their nest structures, and by the additions of secretions and excreta in nest construction. The majority of ants and termites probably increase carbon and nutrient levels, especially nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, as well as exchangeable magnesium and calcium. The extent of the increases depends greatly on the type of mound construction and the degree to which organic material is incorporated. Problems with research techniques include the use of a variety of sampling techniques by different researchers, lack of detailed soil description or classification, and inadequate description of location of sampling points. These deficiencies make it difficult to draw valid comparisons between research projects. Many researchers also base their generalizations on ant or termite soil modifications on a small number of samples, although during the 1980s there has been an increase in sample sizes. Contradictory data often result from projects being undertaken on different species and in different environments. Future research directions need to include a greater concentration on the morphology of ant nests, more detailed assessment of the influence of ants and termites on soil structure and water infiltration, an increase in biopedological research in human-modified environments, a greater emphasis on termites and ants other than the most dominant or prominent species, and a focus on community as distinct from single-species effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sr9900055

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 486

Metadata

Authors
Lobry de Bruyn, L., & Conacher, A.
Venue
Australian Journal of Soil Research
Published
1990-02-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
55-93
ISSN
  • 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-568X
OpenAlex
W2064315056
Cited by
486
References
0
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of termites and ants in soil modification - a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9900055
The paper
Lobry de Bruyn, L., & Conacher, A. (1990). The role of termites and ants in soil modification - a review. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9900055

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.