The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter
Abstract
The sensitivity of soil organic carbon (Corg) and microbial carbon (Cmic) measurements, and the Cm~,/Co,, ratio, to reflect climatic, vegetation, cropping and management history was investigated using a range of topsoils in New Zealand. The Cmic generally comprised 1-4% of Corg, with the proportion being consistently greater under pastures, than the equivalent soil under native forest, exotic forest or arable cropping. However, absolute values differed markedly between soils and were greatly influenced by texture, mineralogy and the Corg content. The Cmic recovered more rapidly than Corg on returning to pasture following cropping. There was a generally greater Corg content in those soils from the areas with higher precipitation, but the precipitation-evaporation quotient proposed by Insam et al. (Soil Biol. Biochem. 1989, 21, 211-21) to predict the relationship between Cmic and Corg, greatly underestimated the Cmic content of New Zealand soils and there was too great a scatter in the data to derive a revised regression formula. The Cmic and the Cmic/Cor, ratio are useful measures to monitor soil organic matter and both provide a more sensitive index than COrg measured alone. However, under typical climatic and land use conditions in New Zealand, the values do not appear readily transferrable between soils. To ascertain whether a soil has achieved equilibrium in organic matter status, it will be necessary to establish reference values to which a tested soil can be compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover.
Jenkinson, D. S., & Ladd, J. N. (1981) · Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) · Cited by 1,510
Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils
Anderson, T.-H., & Domsch, K. H. (1989) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(89)90117-x · Cited by 1,275
Methods for chemical analysis of soils
Blakemore, L. C. ;. S. (1981) · doi:10.7931/dl1-sbsr-10a · Cited by 1,234
Powlson, D. S., Prookes, P. C., & Christensen, B. T. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90076-9 · Cited by 1,111
Anderson, T.-H., & Domsch, K. H. (1990) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(90)90094-g · Cited by 1,091
Insam, H., & Domsch, K. H. (1988) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02011711 · Cited by 670
Soil Organic Matter and Its Role in Crop Production
(1973) · Developments in Soil Science · doi:10.1016/s0166-2481(08)x7020-5 · Cited by 667
Gupta, V. V. S. R., & Germida, J. J. (1988) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(88)90082-x · Cited by 642
Sparling, G. P., & West, A. W. (1988) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(88)90014-4 · Cited by 470
Self-citationVan Veen, J. A., Ladd, J. N., & Amato, M. (1985) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(85)90128-2 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Blair, G., Lefroy, R., & Lisle, L. (1995) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9951459 · Cited by 2,103
Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils
Gregorich, E. G., Carter, M. R., Angers, D. A., Monreal, C. M., & Ellert, B. H. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss94-051 · Cited by 1,150
McDaniel, M. D., Tiemann, L. K., & Grandy, A. S. (2014) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/13-0616.1 · Cited by 846
Heavy metals and soil microbes
Abdu, N., Abdullahi, A. A., & Abdulkadir, A. (2017) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x · Cited by 478
Belay-Tedla, A., Zhou, X., Su, B., Wan, S., & Luo, Y. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.003 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparling, G.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1992-04-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-207
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W2075347554
- Cited by
- 874
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 20.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9920195
- The paper
- Sparling, G. (1992). Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9920195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.