Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sodic soils - New perspectives

Sumner, ME·1993·Australian Journal of Soil Research

Abstract

There are large areas of the world where soils are adversely affected by the presence of sodium (Na) as an exchangeable cation. Unlike their saline counterparts which are more extensive, sodic soils have received less attention in the literature. There has been considerable disagreement concerning the definition of sodicity, owing largely to the fact that many experiments used in the development of definitions did not account for the presence of salts in the water used to measure hydraulic properties. These problems are discussed and the conclusion is reached that a single simple definition is no longer possible. This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that many soils which would never have fallen into a previously defined sodic category, do in fact exhibit sodic properties. The major focus of this account of sodicity will therefore be the soils which contain relatively low levels of exchangeable Na. As such soils are widespread in both humid and subhumid areas of the world and are responsible for the production of a large proportion of the world cereal crop, they deserve special attention. Because swelling and dispersion are the primary processes responsible for the degradation of soil physical properties in the presence of Na, an account of clay behaviour in relation to Na and electrolyte concentration is presented before exploring these new realms of sodicity. Pure clay systems are not always suitable for use as models of soil behaviour in terms of dispersion and flocculation. However, as far as swelling is concerned, the correspondence is much better. Nevertheless, the effects of the exchangeable cations on dispersion are predictable albeit usually only qualitatively. This is partly due to the phenomenon of 'demixing' in which the cations are not distributed over all surfaces in the same proportions. The effects of Na and electrolyte concentration in relation to hydraulic conductivity, infiltration, crusting, runoff, erosion and hardsetting are discussed from which it emerges that the effects of Na are manifested in measurable and often sizeable proportions down to very low levels far below those previously used to define sodic soils. The primary processes responsible for physical degradation are swelling at relatively high levels and clay dispersion throughout the range of exchangeable Na percentage (ESP). Provided that the total electrolyte concentration (TEC) is below the critical flocculation concentration (CFC), clays will disperse spontaneously at high ESP values, whereas at lower ESP levels, inputs of energy are required for dispersion. The TEC of the ambient solution, because of its effects in promoting clay flocculation, is crucial in determining soil physical behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sr9930683

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Sumner, M.
Venue
Australian Journal of Soil Research
Published
1993-12-01
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
683-750
ISSN
  • 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-568X
OpenAlex
W2062055984
Cited by
559
References
0
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sodic soils - New perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9930683
The paper
Sumner, M. (1993). Sodic soils - New perspectives. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9930683

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.