The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests
Abstract
Fire exclusion policies have affected stand structure and wildfire hazard in north American ponderosa pine forests. Wildfires are becoming more severe in stands where trees are densely stocked with shade-tolerant understory trees. Although forest managers have been employing fuel treatment techniques to reduce wildfire hazard for decades, little scientific evidence documents the success of treatments in reducing fire severity. Our research quantitatively examined fire effects in treated and untreated stands in western United States national forests. Four ponderosa pine sites in Montana, Washington, California and Arizona were selected for study. Fuel treatments studied include: prescribed fire only, whole-tree thinning, and thinning followed by prescribed fire. On-the-ground fire effects were measured in adjacent treated and untreated forests. We developed post facto fire severity and stand structure measurement techniques to complete field data collection. We found that crown fire severity was mitigated in stands that had some type of fuel treatment compared to stands without any treatment. At all four of the sites, the fire severity and crown scorch were significantly lower at the treated sites. Results from this research indicate that fuel treatments, which remove small diameter trees, may be beneficial for reducing crown fire hazard in ponderosa pine sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments
Agee, J. K., & Skinner, C. N. (2005) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.034 · Cited by 1,397
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.
Fernandes, P. M., & Botelho, H. S. (2003) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf02042 · Cited by 718
FEDERAL FOREST‐FIRE POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES
Stephens, S. L., & Ruth, L. W. (2005) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/04-0545 · Cited by 584
Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface
Theobald, D. M., & Romme, W. H. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.002 · Cited by 487
The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire
Finney, M. A. (2005) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.010 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollet, J., & Omi, P. N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2002-03-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2121970066
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/wf01045
- The paper
- Pollet, J., & Omi, P. N. (2002). Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf01045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.