The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC
Abstract
A coupled atmospheric/wildfire behavior model is described that utilizes physics-based process models to represent wildfire behavior. Five simulations are presented, four of which are highly idealized situations that are meant to illustrate some of the dependencies of the model on environmental conditions. The fifth simulation consists of a fire burning in complex terrain with non-homogeneous vegetation and realistic meteorological conditions. The simulated fire behavior develops out of the coupling of a set of very complex processes and not from prescribed rules based on empirical data. This represents a new direction in wildfire modeling that we believe will eventually help decision makers and land managers do their jobs more effectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer
Incropera, F. P. (1985) · Cited by 3,677
An Introduction to Fire Dynamics
Drysdale, D. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119975465 · Cited by 2,598
Introduction to fluid mechanics
(2013) · Engineering Science · doi:10.4324/9780203114964-25 · Cited by 1,957
FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation
Finney, M. A. (1998) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-rp-4 · Cited by 1,617
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Moffatt, H. K., & Jr., E. B. M. (1966) · The Mathematical Gazette · doi:10.2307/3614006 · Cited by 601
The Parameterization of Radiation for Numerical Weather Prediction and Climate Models
Stephens, G. L. (1984) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<0826:tporfn>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 347
A Coupled AtmosphereFire Model: Convective Feedback on Fire-Line Dynamics
Clark, T. L., Jenkins, M. A., Coen, J., & Packham, D. (1996) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<0875:acamcf>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 219
A transport model for prediction of wildfire behavior
Linn, R. R. (1997) · doi:10.2172/505313 · Cited by 186
Self-citation
Cited by
Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-physical models
Sullivan, A. L. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06143 · Cited by 474
Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires
Koo, E., Pagni, P. J., Weise, D. R., & Woycheese, J. P. (2010) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf07119 · Cited by 336
Effects of bark beetle–caused tree mortality on wildfire
Hicke, J. A., Johnson, M. C., Hayes, J. L., & Preisler, H. K. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.02.005 · Cited by 317
Numerical simulation and experiments of burning douglas fir trees
Mell, W., Maranghides, A., McDermott, R., & Manzello, S. L. (2009) · Combustion and Flame · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.015 · Cited by 317
Jolly, W. M., Parsons, R. A., Hadlow, A. M., Cohn, G. M., McAllister, S. S., Popp, J. B., Hubbard, R. M., & Negron, J. F. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.022 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Linn, R., Reisner, J., Colman, J. J., & Winterkamp, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2002-11-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 233-246
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2099722563
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
