The wildland fuel cell concept: an approach to characterize fine-scale variation in fuels and fire in frequently burned longleaf pine forests
Abstract
In ecosystems with frequent surface fire regimes, fire and fuel heterogeneity has been largely overlooked owing to the lack of unburned patches and the difficulty in measuring fire behavior at fine scales (0.1–10 m). The diverse vegetation in these ecosystems varies at these fine scales. This diversity could be driven by the influences of local interactions among patches of understorey vegetation and canopy-supplied fine fuels on fire behavior, yet no method we know of can capture fine-scale fuel and fire measurements such that these relationships could be rigorously tested. We present here an original method for inventorying of fine-scale fuels and in situ measures of fire intensity within longleaf pine forests of the south-eastern USA. Using ground-based LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) with traditional fuel inventory approaches, we characterized within-fuel bed variation into discrete patches, termed wildland fuel cells, which had distinct fuel composition, characteristics, and architecture that became spatially independent beyond 0.5 m2. Spatially explicit fire behavior was measured in situ through digital infrared thermography. We found that fire temperatures and residence times varied at similar scales to those observed for wildland fuel cells. The wildland fuels cell concept could seamlessly connect empirical studies with numerical models or cellular automata models of fire behavior, representing a promising means to better predict within-burn heterogeneity and fire effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between fire behaviour and fire effects has been improved by quantification of fire intensity, at least above-ground.
“The relationship between fire behaviour and fire effects has been improved by quantification of fire intensity, at least above-ground (Hiers, O'Brien, Mitchell, Grego, & Loudermilk, 2009).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Hiers et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Pyroaerobiology: the aerosolization and transport of viable microbial life by wildland fire
Kobziar, L. N., Pingree, M. R. A., Larson, H., Dreaden, T. J., Green, S., & Smith, J. A. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2507 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hiers, J. K., O’Brien, J. J., Mitchell, R. J., Grego, J. M., & Loudermilk, E. L.
- Affiliations
- The Jones Center at Ichauway (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- O’Brien, Joseph J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2009-05-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-325
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2080272124
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Woodruff Foundation
- Robert W. Woodruff Foundation
- Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center
- Hort Innovation
- Southern Research Station
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
- Keywords
- fire behavior, longleaf pine forest, ground-based lidar, digital infrared thermography, fire temperature, fire effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review