Cited by 66Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil erosion and sediment transportRangeland and Wildlife Management

Hydrologic and erosion responses to wildfire along the rangeland–xeric forest continuum in the western US: a review and model of hydrologic vulnerability

Williams, C. Jason, Pierson, Frederick B., Robichaud, Peter R., Boll, Jan·2014·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

The recent increase in wildfire activity across the rangeland–xeric forest continuum in the western United States has landscape-scale consequences in terms of runoff and erosion. Concomitant cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) invasions, plant community transitions and a warming climate in recent decades along grassland–shrubland–woodland–xeric forest transitions have promoted frequent and large wildfires, and continuance of the trend appears likely if warming climate conditions prevail. These changes potentially increase overall hydrologic vulnerability by spatially and temporally increasing soil exposure to runoff and erosion processes. Plot and hillslope-scale studies demonstrate burning may increase event runoff or erosion by factors of 2–40 over small-plot scales and more than 100-fold over large-plot to hillslope scales. Reports of flooding and debris flow events from rangelands and xeric forests following burning show the potential risk to natural resources, property, infrastructure and human life. We present a conceptual model for evaluating post-fire hydrologic vulnerability and risk. We suggest that post-fire risk assessment of potential hydrologic hazards should adopt a probability-based approach that considers varying site susceptibility in conjunction with a range of potential storms and that determines the hydrologic response magnitudes likely to affect values-at-risk. Our review suggests that improved risk assessment requires better understanding in several key areas including quantification of interactions between varying storm intensities and measures of site susceptibility, the varying effects of soil water repellency, and the spatial scaling of post-fire hydrologic response across rangeland–xeric forest plant communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf12161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Headwater forests are now susceptible to wildland fire risk or will become so in the near future.

    “these forests are now susceptible to wildland fire risk or will become so in the near future6,7.”

    From Burned forests impact water supplies (2018) · cites this paper as [6]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 187 · Cited by 66

Authors
Williams, C. J., Pierson, F. B., Robichaud, P. R., & Boll, J.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, C. Jason
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
155-172
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2003414721
Cited by
66
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Interagency Fire Center
  • U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
forest fires, soil erosion, runoff, risk assessment, cheatgrass invasion, cheatgrass, soil water repellency, storm intensity, spatial scaling, debris flows, floods, global warming, American West

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review