Cited by 62Fire effects on ecosystemsFire dynamics and safety researchFire Detection and Safety Systems

Anthropogenic effects on global mean fire size

Hantson, Stijn, Lasslop, Gitta, Kloster, Silvia, Chuvieco, Emilio·2015·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

Wildland fires are an important agent in the earth’s system. Multiple efforts are currently in progress to better represent wildland fires in earth system models. Although wildland fires are a natural disturbance factor, humans have an important effect on fire occurrence by directly igniting and suppressing fires and indirectly influencing fire behaviour by changing land cover and landscape structure. Although these factors are recognised, their quantitative effect on fire growth and burned area are not well understood and therefore only partly taken into account in current process-based fire models. Here we analyse the influence of humans on mean fire size globally. The mean fire size was extracted from the global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) burned area product MCD45. We found a linear decreasing trend between population density and observed mean fire size over the globe, as well as a negative effect of cropland cover and net income. We implemented the effect of population density on fire growth in a global vegetation model including a process-based fire model (SPITFIRE–JSBACH). When including this demographic control, spatial trends in modelled fraction of burned area generally improved when compared with satellite-derived burned area data. More process-based solutions to limit fire spread are needed in the future, but the empirical relations described here serve as an intermediate step to improve current fire models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf14208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many fire models now explicitly include ignitions and their sources.

    “Many fire models now explicitly include ignitions and their sources (Hantson, Lasslop, Kloster, & Chuvieco, 2015;Lasslop, Thonicke, & Kloster, 2014;Li, Levis, & Ward, 2013;Mangeon et al., 2016;Scheller, Kretchun, Hawbaker, & Henne, 2019;Yue et al., 2014).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Hantson et al., 2015

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 62

Authors
Hantson, S., Lasslop, G., Kloster, S., & Chuvieco, E.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
Corresponding author
Hantson, Stijn
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2015-06-15
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
589-596
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W1900295523
Cited by
62
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Keywords
forest fires, fire size, anthropogenic impacts, population density, cropland cover, net income, burned area, fire suppression, fire growth, MODIS burned area, global vegetation models, land cover change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review