Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA
Abstract
Wildfires commonly increase nutrient, carbon, sediment and metal inputs to streams, yet the factors responsible for the type, magnitude and duration of water quality effects are poorly understood. Prior work by the current authors found increased nitrogen, phosphorus and cation exports were common the first 5 post-fire years from a synthesis of 159 wildfires across the western United States. In the current study, an analysis is undertaken to determine factors that best explain post-fire streamwater responses observed in those watersheds. Increased post-fire total nitrogen and phosphorus loading were proportional to the catchment extent of moderate and high burn severity. While post-fire dissolved metal concentrations were correlated with pre-fire soil organic matter. Total metal concentration increased where post-fire Normalised Difference Vegetation Index, a remote sensing indicator of live green vegetation, was low. When pre-fire soil field capacity exceeded 17%, there was a 750% median increase in total metals export to streams. Overall, the current analysis identified burn severity, post-fire vegetation cover and several soil properties as the key variables explaining extended post-fire water quality response across a broad range of conditions found in the western US.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most chemical concentrations in water increase with greater fire severity.
“Most chemical concentrations in water, for example, increase with greater fire severity (Rhoades et al., 2011, 2019; Rust et al., 2019).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2019
In general, metal concentrations increased with greater fire severity.
“In general, metal concentrations increased with greater fire severity (Rust et al., 2019).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2019
Nutrients and metals were commonly elevated post-fire.
“Similar to the other studies (e.g., Rust et al., 2018, 2019), we found that nutrients and metals were commonly elevated post-fire.”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Rust et al., 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., & Hogue, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Colorado School of Mines (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rust, Ashley J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2019-09-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 769-784
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2972149527
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- wildfire effects on streams, burn severity, dissolved metals, soil organic matter, soil field capacity, NDVI, nutrient loading, forested watersheds, American West
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review