Cited by 32Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Soil carbon and nitrogen eroded after severe wildfire and erosion mitigation treatments

Pierson, Derek N., Robichaud, Peter R., Rhoades, Charles C., Brown, Robert E.·2019·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

Erosion of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) following severe wildfire may have deleterious effects on downstream resources and ecosystem recovery. Although C and N losses in combustion and runoff have been studied extensively, soil C and N transported by post-fire erosion has rarely been quantified in burned landscapes. To better understand the magnitude and temporal pattern of these losses, we analysed the C and N content of sediment collected in severely burned hillslopes and catchments across the western USA over the first 4 post-fire years. We also compared soil C and N losses from areas receiving common erosion-mitigation treatments and untreated, burned areas. The concentrations of C and N in the eroded material (0.23–0.98 g C kg−1 and 0.01–0.04 g N kg−1) were similar to those of mineral soils rather than organic soil horizons or combusted vegetation. Losses of eroded soil C and N were highly variable across sites, and were highest the first 2 years after fire. Cumulative erosional losses from untreated, burned areas ranged from 73 to 2253 kg C ha−1 and from 3.3 to 110 kg N ha−1 over 4 post-fire years. Post-fire erosion-mitigation treatments reduced C and N losses by up to 75% compared with untreated areas. Losses in post-fire erosion are estimated to be <10% of the total soil C and N combusted during severe wildfire and <10% of post-fire soil C and N stocks remaining in the upper 20 cm of mineral soil. Although loss of soil C and N in post-fire erosion is unlikely to impair the productivity of recovering vegetation, export of C and N may influence downstream water quality and aquatic ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf18193

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High rates of erosion following post-disturbance vegetation mortality can increase losses of soil organic matter after a fire.

    “Additionally, high rates of erosion following post-disturbance vegetation mortality can increase losses of soil organic matter after a fire (Pierson, Robichaud, Rhoades, & Brown, 2019).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Pierson et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierson, D. N., Robichaud, P. R., Rhoades, C. C., & Brown, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Pierson, Derek N.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2019-03-19
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
814-821
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2921863812
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • Rocky Mountain Research Station
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
post-fire erosion, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, forest fires, sediment carbon, sediment nitrogen, watershed, downstream water quality, ecosystem recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review