Cited by 28Fire effects on ecosystemsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Can ash from smoldering fires increase peatland soil pH?

Open access
Marcotte, A. L., Limpens, J., Stoof, C. R., Stoorvogel, J. J.·2022·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

Peatland wildfire frequency and severity are increasing globally owing to climate change. The direct risk of elevated greenhouse gas emissions from peat burning receives much attention, yet the risks to vegetation composition or peat decomposition from alkaline ash inputs are poorly understood. We explored whether ash produced during smoldering increases peatland topsoil (∼0–25 cm) pH through field observations and laboratory experiments. We assessed spatial patterns of smoldering and ash presence, and measured soil and ash pH after a peatland wildfire in the Netherlands. Additionally, a peat smoldering experiment was conducted to compare freshly produced ash pH with aged ash pH collected 2 months following the wildfire. Additionally, we assessed the amount of ash needed to increase soil pH. Results showed that ash inputs at the field site were insufficient to increase pH of the acidic peatland after the wildfire. Incubation experiments showed that a ≥3 cm ash layer (ash load 163 t ha–1) would be required to increase soil pH by at least 1 unit. Given that aged ash was slightly acidic and fresh ash was alkaline, leaching and neutralisation of ash after wildfire is likely, suggesting that elevated soil pH from ash input may be transient rather than long term.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf21150

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our observations agree with Marcotte et al. (2022), who observed higher pH in ash analysed immediately after production than in ash collected two months after a peatland wildfire.

    “Our observations agree with Marcotte et al. (2022) who observed higher pH in ash analysed immediately after production (in a peat smouldering experiment) when compared with ash collected two months after a peatland wildfire in the Netherlands.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Christensen E, Hu Y, Restuccia F, Santoso MA (2019) Experimental methods and scales in smouldering wildfires. In 'Fire Effects on Soil Properties'. pp. 267-280. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)
  2. Devito K, Mendoza C, Qualizza C (2012) Conceptualizing water move- ment in the Boreal Plains. Implications for watershed reconstruction. Synthesis report preapred for the Canadian Oil Sands Network for Research and Developement. doi: 10.7939/R32J4H · DOI

Authors
Marcotte, A. L., Limpens, J., Stoof, C. R., & Stoorvogel, J. J.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Marcotte, A. L.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2022-05-24
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
607-620
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W4285216910
Cited by
28
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
peatland fires, smoldering combustion, ash deposition, soil pH, peat decomposition, greenhouse gas emissions, peat combustion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review