The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Fuel, Weather and Fire Shape Variables on Fire-Spread in Grasslands
Abstract
Fire-spread was measured on 121 grass fires in a 2500 ha experimental site in the Northern Territory, Australia. Selected plots were harvested to alter the height, load and bulk density of the fuel-bed. Fires were lit from a line and allowed to travel up to 400 m down-wind. Fire-spread was correlated with fuel, weather and fireshape variables using multiple regression techniques. Wind speed had most effect on fire-spread. The influence of the other variables was examined after a model for wind speed and moisture content had been fitted. Fuel load did not influence fire-spread. Fires in natural swards burnt 18% faster than fires in cut grass, but this increase could not be fully explained by changes in the height or bulk density of the fuel bed. Grass type characterised either by species group or by surface-area-to-volume ratio of the fuel particle, did not appear to significantly influence fire-spread. Differences in spread rates between the two grasses were attributed to differences in grass curing. The influence of grass curing appeared to be less than indicated by published models. Models of fire-spread in grasslands currently in use need to be revised. Ignition line length was a significant variable influencing fire-spread and this must be taken into consideration when using experimental fires to validate theoretical models or develop empirical models from field observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass
Baskerville, G. L. (1972) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x72-009 · Cited by 1,158
Luke, R. H., McArthur, A. G., Forestry, A., Bureau, T., & Scientific, C. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 315
Cited by
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.
Fernandes, P. M., & Botelho, H. S. (2003) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf02042 · Cited by 718
Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-physical models
Sullivan, A. L. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06143 · Cited by 474
Evolution of human-driven fire regimes in Africa
Archibald, S., Staver, A. C., & Levin, S. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1118648109 · Cited by 376
Biological and geophysical feedbacks with fire in the Earth system
Archibald, S., Lehmann, C. E. R., Belcher, C. M., Bond, W. J., Bradstock, R. A., Daniau, A.-L., Dexter, K. G., Forrestel, E. J., Greve, M., He, T., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa9ead · Cited by 341
Numerical simulation and experiments of burning douglas fir trees
Mell, W., Maranghides, A., McDermott, R., & Manzello, S. L. (2009) · Combustion and Flame · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.015 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheney, N., Gould, J., & Catchpole, W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-44
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2041183160
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Fuel, Weather and Fire Shape Variables on Fire-Spread in Grasslands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/wf9930031
- The paper
- Cheney, N., Gould, J., & Catchpole, W. (1993). The Influence of Fuel, Weather and Fire Shape Variables on Fire-Spread in Grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf9930031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.