Cited by 74Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesThermoregulation and physiological responses

Metabolic physiology of the north-western marsupial mole, Notoryctes caurinus (Marsupialia : Notoryctidae)

Withers, P. C., Thompson, G. G., Seymour, R. S.·2000·Australian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

We studied the thermal and metabolic physiology of a single specimen of the north-western marsupial mole, Notoryctes caurinus , an almost completely fossorial Australian marsupial, and compared it with the morphologically convergent Namib desert golden mole, Eremitalpa granti namibensis . This was the first study of any aspect of the physiology of this rare marsupial. Mean body mass of the marsupial mole was 34 g. Body temperature (Tb) was low and labile, ranging from 22.7 to 30.8°C over a range of ambient temperature (Ta) from 15 to 30°C. The highest Tb of 30.8°C was significantly lower than expected for a marsupial of this body mass. Metabolic rate varied with Ta in an attenuated fashion for an endotherm, because of the labile Tb. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) was 0.63 mL O2 g–1 h–1, at a Ta of 30°C. This was lower than expected for a 34-g marsupial, but was not different from expected for a marsupial when corrected to a Tb of 35°C (0.94 mL O2 g–1 h–1). Evaporative water loss increased from 0.8 mg g–1 h–1 at 15°C to 3.7 at 30°C. Wet thermal conductance was 0.2 mL O2 g–1 h–1 °C–1 at 15°C and 0.6 at 25°C; these values were higher than expected for a marsupial. The net metabolic cost of transport (NCOT) for running (0.0022 mL O2 g–1 m–1 at a mean velocity of 484 m h–1) was similar to expected values for walking and running mammals. The NCOT for sand-swimming (0.124 mL O2 g–1 m–1 at a mean velocity of 7.6 m h–1) was substantially higher, and at a much lower velocity than for running, but was similar to NCOT for sand-swimming by the Namib golden mole. We conclude that the marsupial mole differs in some aspects of thermal and metabolic physiology from other marsupials, most likely reflecting its almost completely fossorial existence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/zo99073

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T_b is positively correlated with body mass.

    “which is also positively correlated with body mass (Withers et al., 2000;White and Seymour, 2003).”

    From Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism (2005) · cites this paper as Withers et al., 2000

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 74

Authors
Withers, P. C., Thompson, G. G., & Seymour, R. S.
Venue
Australian Journal of Zoology
Published
2000-07-21
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
241-258
ISSN
  • 0004-959X (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-5698
OpenAlex
W1926670065
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
marsupial moles, thermal physiology, metabolic rate, basal metabolic rate, body temperature, evaporative water loss, thermal conductance, fossoriality, convergent evolution, golden moles, oxygen consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review