Metabolic physiology of the north-western marsupial mole, Notoryctes caurinus (Marsupialia : Notoryctidae)
Abstract
We studied the thermal and metabolic physiology of a single specimen of the north-western marsupial mole, Notoryctes caurinus , an almost completely fossorial Australian marsupial, and compared it with the morphologically convergent Namib desert golden mole, Eremitalpa granti namibensis . This was the first study of any aspect of the physiology of this rare marsupial. Mean body mass of the marsupial mole was 34 g. Body temperature (Tb) was low and labile, ranging from 22.7 to 30.8°C over a range of ambient temperature (Ta) from 15 to 30°C. The highest Tb of 30.8°C was significantly lower than expected for a marsupial of this body mass. Metabolic rate varied with Ta in an attenuated fashion for an endotherm, because of the labile Tb. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) was 0.63 mL O2 g–1 h–1, at a Ta of 30°C. This was lower than expected for a 34-g marsupial, but was not different from expected for a marsupial when corrected to a Tb of 35°C (0.94 mL O2 g–1 h–1). Evaporative water loss increased from 0.8 mg g–1 h–1 at 15°C to 3.7 at 30°C. Wet thermal conductance was 0.2 mL O2 g–1 h–1 °C–1 at 15°C and 0.6 at 25°C; these values were higher than expected for a marsupial. The net metabolic cost of transport (NCOT) for running (0.0022 mL O2 g–1 m–1 at a mean velocity of 484 m h–1) was similar to expected values for walking and running mammals. The NCOT for sand-swimming (0.124 mL O2 g–1 m–1 at a mean velocity of 7.6 m h–1) was substantially higher, and at a much lower velocity than for running, but was similar to NCOT for sand-swimming by the Namib golden mole. We conclude that the marsupial mole differs in some aspects of thermal and metabolic physiology from other marsupials, most likely reflecting its almost completely fossorial existence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
T_b is positively correlated with body mass.
“which is also positively correlated with body mass (Withers et al., 2000;White and Seymour, 2003).”
From Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism (2005) · cites this paper as Withers et al., 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 74
- Authors
- Withers, P. C., Thompson, G. G., & Seymour, R. S.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2000-07-21
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-258
- ISSN
- 0004-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5698
- OpenAlex
- W1926670065
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Keywords
- marsupial moles, thermal physiology, metabolic rate, basal metabolic rate, body temperature, evaporative water loss, thermal conductance, fossoriality, convergent evolution, golden moles, oxygen consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review