The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hatching failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds
Open accessAbstract
Severe bottlenecks can reduce genetic diversity and increase inbreeding as individuals are forced to mate with close relatives, but it is unknown at what minimum population size the negative fitness consequences of bottlenecks are expressed. The New Zealand avifauna contains a large number of species that have gone through bottlenecks of varying severity, providing an exceptional opportunity to test this question by using the comparative method. Using decreased hatchability as a measure of fitness costs, we found that hatching failure was significantly greater among both native and introduced species that had passed through bottlenecks of <150 individuals. Comparisons between pre- and postbottleneck populations of introduced species suggest that hatching problems arise even in populations founded by <600 individuals. Our study confirms that hatching failure is widespread and persistent among birds passing through severe bottlenecks and that the population sizes at which this fitness cost is expressed are several times greater than the number of individuals currently used to found most new populations of endangered species. We recommend that conservation managers revise the protocols they use for reintroductions or they may unwittingly reduce the long-term viability of the species they are trying to save.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Cited by
Frankham, R. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.002 · Cited by 2,354
Neglect of Genetic Diversity in Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
LAIKRE, L., ALLENDORF, F. W., ARONER, L. C., BAKER, C. S., GREGOVICH, D. P., HANSEN, M. M., JACKSON, J. A., KENDALL, K. C., McKELVEY, K., NEEL, M. C., et al. (2010) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01425.x · Cited by 286
Resolving the genetic paradox in invasive species
Frankham, R. (2005) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800634 · Cited by 277
The comparative method in conservation biology
Fisher, D. O., & Owens, I. P. F. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.004 · Cited by 269
Inbreeding depression of sexually selected traits and attractiveness in the zebra finch
Bolund, E., Martin, K., Kempenaers, B., & Forstmeier, W. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.014 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Briskie, J. V., & Mackintosh, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-29
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 558-561
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2078043768
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hatching failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0305103101
- The paper
- Briskie, J. V., & Mackintosh, M. (2004). Hatching failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0305103101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.