The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution: Practical and theoretical ramifications
Open accessAbstract
A fundamentally new approach to asymmetric catalysis in organic chemistry is described based on the in vitro evolution of enantioselective enzymes. It comprises the appropriate combination of gene mutagenesis and expression coupled with an efficient high-throughput screening system for evaluating enantioselectivity (enantiomeric excess assay). Several such cycles lead to a “Darwinistic” process, which is independent of any knowledge concerning the structure or the mechanism of the enzyme being evolved. The challenge is to choose the optimal mutagenesis methods to navigate efficiently in protein sequence space. As a first example, the combination of error-prone mutagenesis, saturation mutagenesis, and DNA-shuffling led to a dramatic enhancement of enantioselectivity of a lipase acting as a catalyst in the kinetic resolution of a chiral ester. Mutations at positions remote from the catalytically active center were identified, a surprising finding, which was explained on the basis of a novel relay mechanism. The scope and limitations of the method are discussed, including the prospect of directed evolution of stereoselective hybrid catalysts composed of robust protein hosts in which transition metal centers have been implanted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymmetric Catalysis of Epoxide Ring-Opening Reactions
Jacobsen, E. N. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar960061v · Cited by 1,261
Cited by
Reetz, M. T. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000826 · Cited by 538
Self-citationAddressing the Numbers Problem in Directed Evolution
Reetz, M. T., Kahakeaw, D., & Lohmer, R. (2008) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.200800298 · Cited by 438
Self-citationImproving enzyme properties: when are closer mutations better?
Morley, K. L., & Kazlauskas, R. J. (2005) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.03.005 · Cited by 438
Enzymatic reductions for the chemist
Hollmann, F., Arends, I. W. C. E., & Holtmann, D. (2011) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c1gc15424a · Cited by 377
Chemoselectivity and the Curious Reactivity Preferences of Functional Groups
Afagh, N. A., & Yudin, A. K. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200901317 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Reetz, M. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-04-12
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5716-5722
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1898560826
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution: Practical and theoretical ramifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0306866101
- The paper
- Reetz, M. T. (2004). Controlling the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution: Practical and theoretical ramifications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306866101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.