The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of bacteria in suspension by using a superconducting quantum interference device
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate a technique for detecting magnetically labeled Listeria monocytogenes and for measuring the binding rate between antibody-linked magnetic particles and bacteria. This sensitive assay quantifies specific bacteria in a sample without the need to immobilize them or wash away unbound magnetic particles. In the measurement, we add 50-nm-diameter superparamagnetic magnetite particles, coated with antibodies, to an aqueous sample containing L. monocytogenes. We apply a pulsed magnetic field to align the magnetic dipole moments and use a high-transition temperature superconducting quantum interference device, an extremely sensitive detector of magnetic flux, to measure the magnetic relaxation signal when the field is turned off. Unbound particles randomize direction by Brownian rotation too quickly to be detected. In contrast, particles bound to L. monocytogenes are effectively immobilized and relax in about 1 s by rotation of the internal dipole moment. This Néel relaxation process is detected by the superconducting quantum interference device. The measurements indicate a detection limit of (5.6 ± 1.1) × 10 6L. monocytogenes in our sample volume of 20 μl. If the sample volume were reduced to 1 nl, we estimate that the detection limit could be improved to 230 ± 40 L. monocytogenes cells. Time-resolved measurements yield the binding rate between the particles and bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Kell, A. J., Stewart, G., Ryan, S., Peytavi, R., Boissinot, M., Huletsky, A., Bergeron, M. G., & Simard, B. (2008) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn700183g · Cited by 320
Recent Topics in High-Tc Superconductive Electronics
Tonouchi, M., Fujimaki, A., Tanabe, K., Enpuku, K., Nikawa, K., & Kobayashi, T. (2005) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1143/jjap.44.7735 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossman, H. L., Myers, W. R., Vreeland, V. J., Bruehl, R., Alper, M. D., Bertozzi, C. R., & Clarke, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-19
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-134
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2024310259
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of bacteria in suspension by using a superconducting quantum interference device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0307128101
- The paper
- Grossman, H. L., Myers, W. R., Vreeland, V. J., Bruehl, R., Alper, M. D., Bertozzi, C. R., & Clarke, J. (2004). Detection of bacteria in suspension by using a superconducting quantum interference device. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307128101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.