The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whole-genome annotation by using evidence integration in functional-linkage networks
Open accessAbstract
The advent of high-throughput biology has catalyzed a remarkable improvement in our ability to identify new genes. A large fraction of newly discovered genes have an unknown functional role, particularly when they are specific to a particular lineage or organism. These genes, currently labeled “hypothetical,” might support important biological cell functions and could potentially serve as targets for medical, diagnostic, or pharmacogenomic studies. An important challenge to the scientific community is to associate these newly predicted genes with a biological function that can be validated by experimental screens. In the absence of sequence or structural homology to known genes, we must rely on advanced biotechnological methods, such as DNA chips and protein–protein interaction screens as well as computational techniques to assign putative functions to these genes. In this article, we propose an effective methodology for combining biological evidence obtained in several high-throughput experimental screens and integrating this evidence in a way that provides consistent functional assignments to hypothetical genes. We use the visualization method of propagation diagrams to illustrate the flow of functional evidence that supports the functional assignments produced by the algorithm. Our results contain a number of predictions and furnish strong evidence that integration of functional information is indeed a promising direction for improving the accuracy and robustness of functional genomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Cited by
A critical assessment of Mus musculusgene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence
Peña-Castillo, L., Tasan, M., Myers, C. L., Lee, H., Joshi, T., Zhang, C., Guan, Y., Leone, M., Pagnani, A., Kim, W. K., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s2 · Cited by 248
Cao, M., Zhang, H., Park, J., Daniels, N. M., Crovella, M. E., Cowen, L. J., & Hescott, B. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076339 · Cited by 131
Biological process linkage networks
Dotan-Cohen, D., Letovsky, S., Melkman, A. A., & Kasif, S. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005313 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Karaoz, U., Murali, T. M., Letovsky, S., Zheng, Y., Ding, C., Cantor, C. R., & Kasif, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-02-23
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2888-2893
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2042210880
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole-genome annotation by using evidence integration in functional-linkage networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0307326101
- The paper
- Karaoz, U., Murali, T. M., Letovsky, S., Zheng, Y., Ding, C., Cantor, C. R., & Kasif, S. (2004). Whole-genome annotation by using evidence integration in functional-linkage networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307326101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.