The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps
Open accessAbstract
Map makers have for many years searched for a way to construct cartograms, maps in which the sizes of geographic regions such as countries or provinces appear in proportion to their population or some other analogous property. Such maps are invaluable for the representation of census results, election returns, disease incidence, and many other kinds of human data. Unfortunately, to scale regions and still have them fit together, one is normally forced to distort the regions' shapes, potentially resulting in maps that are difficult to read. Many methods for making cartograms have been proposed, some of them are extremely complex, but all suffer either from this lack of readability or from other pathologies, like overlapping regions or strong dependence on the choice of coordinate axes. Here, we present a technique based on ideas borrowed from elementary physics that suffers none of these drawbacks. Our method is conceptually simple and produces useful, elegant, and easily readable maps. We illustrate the method with applications to the results of the 2000 U.S. presidential election, lung cancer cases in the State of New York, and the geographical distribution of stories appearing in the news.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Finding community structure in very large networks
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.066111 · Cited by 7,390
Self-citationAre we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians
Wake, D. B., & Vredenburg, V. T. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801921105 · Cited by 1,786
Small vulnerable sets determine large network cascades in power grids
Yang, Y., Nishikawa, T., & Motter, A. E. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3184 · Cited by 348
World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science
Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00902 · Cited by 304
Pratt, M., Sarmiento, O. L., Montes, F., Ogilvie, D., Marcus, B. H., Perez, L. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60736-3 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Gastner, M. T., & Newman, M. E. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-05-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7499-7504
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2105795805
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0400280101
- The paper
- Gastner, M. T., & Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400280101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.