The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of core amino acids stabilizing rhodopsin
Open accessAbstract
Rhodopsin is the only G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) whose 3D structure is known; therefore, it serves as a prototype for studies of the GPCR family of proteins. Rhodopsin dysfunction has been linked to misfolding, caused by chemical modifications that affect the naturally occurring disulfide bond between C110 and C187. Here, we identify the structural elements that stabilize rhodopsin by computational analysis of the rhodopsin structure and comparison with data from previous in vitro mutational studies. We simulate the thermal unfolding of rhodopsin by breaking the native-state hydrogen bonds sequentially in the order of their relative strength, using the recently developed Floppy Inclusion and Rigid Substructure Topography (FIRST) method [Jacobs, D. J., Rader, A. J., Kuhn, L. A. & Thorpe, M. F. (2001) Proteins 44, 150-165]. Residues most stable under thermal denaturation are part of a core, which is assumed to be important for the formation and stability of folded rhodopsin. This core includes the C110–C187 disulfide bond at the center of residues forming the interface between the transmembrane and the extracellular domains near the retinal binding pocket. Fast mode analysis of rhodopsin using the Gaussian network model also identifies the disulfide bond and the retinal ligand binding pocket to be the most rigid region in rhodopsin. Experiments confirm that 90% of the amino acids predicted by the FIRST method to be part of the core cause misfolding upon mutation. The observed high degree of conservation (78.9%) of this disulfide bond across all GPCR classes suggests that it is critical for the stability and function of GPCRs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled Receptor
Palczewski, K., Kumasaka, T., Hori, T., Behnke, C. A., Motoshima, H., Fox, B. A., Trong, I. L., Teller, D. C., Okada, T., Stenkamp, R. E., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.739 · Cited by 5,637
Cited by
G Protein–Coupled Receptor Rhodopsin
Palczewski, K. (2006) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142743 · Cited by 764
Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology
Bahar, I., & Rader, A. (2005) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2005.08.007 · Cited by 731
Self-citationNormal Mode Analysis of Biomolecular Structures: Functional Mechanisms of Membrane Proteins
Bahar, I., Lezon, T. R., Bakan, A., & Shrivastava, I. H. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900095e · Cited by 537
Self-citationChemistry and Enzymology of Disulfide Cross-Linking in Proteins
Fass, D., & Thorpe, C. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00123 · Cited by 321
Vertebrate Membrane Proteins: Structure, Function, and Insights from Biophysical Approaches
Müller, D. J., Wu, N., & Palczewski, K. (2008) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.107.07111 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Rader, A. J., Anderson, G., Isin, B., Khorana, H. G., Bahar, I., & Klein-Seetharaman, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-05-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7246-7251
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2100284567
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of core amino acids stabilizing rhodopsin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0401429101
- The paper
- Rader, A. J., Anderson, G., Isin, B., Khorana, H. G., Bahar, I., & Klein-Seetharaman, J. (2004). Identification of core amino acids stabilizing rhodopsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401429101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.