The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversing introduced species effects: Experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog
Open accessAbstract
Amphibian population declines and extinctions are occurring even in the world's least impacted areas. The introduction and spread of nonnative predators is one of many proposed causes of amphibian declines. Correlational studies have shown a negative relationship between introduced fishes and declining amphibians, but little direct experimental evidence is available. This study experimentally manipulated the presence and absence of widely introduced salmonids rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) and brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) to test the hypothesis that their introduction has contributed to the decline of the mountain yellow-legged frog ( Rana muscosa ). From 1996 to 2003, the introduced trout were removed from 5 lakes in a remote protected area of the Sierra Nevada, and 16 nearby lakes were used as controls, 8 with introduced trout and 8 without. To determine the vulnerable life stage, rainbow trout were placed in cages in three lakes containing amphibians. Removal of introduced trout resulted in rapid recovery of frog populations, and, in the caging experiment, tadpoles were found to be vulnerable to trout predation. Together, these experiments illustrate that introduced trout are effective predators on R. muscosa tadpoles and suggest ( i ) that the introduction of trout is the most likely mechanism responsible for the decline of this mountain frog and ( ii ) that these negative effects can be reversed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain
Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., & Campbell, J. H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19297 · Cited by 1,429
Cited by
Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians
Wake, D. B., & Vredenburg, V. T. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801921105 · Cited by 1,786
Self-citationEMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASE AS A PROXIMATE CAUSE OF AMPHIBIAN MASS MORTALITY
Rachowicz, L. J., Knapp, R. A., Morgan, J. A. T., Stice, M. J., Vredenburg, V. T., Parker, J. M., & Briggs, C. J. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1671:eidaap]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 299
Self-citationUnderstanding of the impact of chemicals on amphibians: a meta‐analytic review
Egea‐Serrano, A., Relyea, R. A., Tejedo, M., & Torralva, M. (2012) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.249 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Vredenburg, V. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-05-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7646-7650
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2160015371
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversing introduced species effects: Experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0402321101
- The paper
- Vredenburg, V. T. (2004). Reversing introduced species effects: Experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402321101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.