The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining
Open accessAbstract
Gene disruption and overexpression play central roles in the analysis of gene function. Homologous recombination is, in principle, the most efficient method of disrupting, modifying, or replacing a target gene. Although homologous integration of exogenous DNA into the genome occurs readily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , it is rare in many other organisms. We identified and disrupted Neurospora crassa genes homologous to human KU70 and KU80 , which encode proteins that function in nonhomologous end-joining of double-stranded DNA breaks. The resulting mutants, named mus - 51 and mus - 52 , showed higher sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, and bleomycin than wild type, but not to UV, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, camptothecin, or hydroxyurea. Vegetative growth, conidiation, and ascospore production in homozygous crosses were normal. The frequency of integration of exogenous DNA into homologous sequences of the genome in the KU disruption strains of N. crassa was compared with that in wild type, mei-3 , and mus - 11 . In mei-3 and mus - 11 , which are defective in homologous recombination, none or few homologous integration events were observed under any conditions. When mtr target DNA with ≈2-kb 5′ and 3′ flanking regions was used for transformation of the KU disruption strains, 100% of transformants exhibited integration at the homologous site, compared to 10 to 30% for a wild-type recipient. Similar results were obtained when the ad-3A gene was targeted for disruption. These results indicate that KU disruption strains are efficient recipients for gene targeting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA end-joining: from yeast to man
Critchlow, S. E., & Jackson, S. P. (1998) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01284-5 · Cited by 584
Cited by
Colot, H. V., Park, G., Turner, G. E., Ringelberg, C., Crew, C. M., Litvinkova, L., Weiss, R. L., Borkovich, K. A., & Dunlap, J. C. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601456103 · Cited by 1,117
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431
da Silva Ferreira, M. E., Kress, M. R. V. Z., Savoldi, M., Goldman, M. H. S., Härtl, A., Heinekamp, T., Brakhage, A. A., & Goldman, G. H. (2006) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.5.1.207-211.2006 · Cited by 403
Genetic engineering of filamentous fungi — Progress, obstacles and future trends
Meyer, V. (2008) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.001 · Cited by 358
Krappmann, S., Sasse, C., & Braus, G. H. (2006) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.5.1.212-215.2006 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Ninomiya, Y., Suzuki, K., Ishii, C., & Inoue, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-08-06
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 12248-12253
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1590757915
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0402780101
- The paper
- Ninomiya, Y., Suzuki, K., Ishii, C., & Inoue, H. (2004). Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402780101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.