Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining

Open access
Ninomiya, Yuuko, Suzuki, Keiichiro, Ishii, Chizu, Inoue, Hirokazu·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Gene disruption and overexpression play central roles in the analysis of gene function. Homologous recombination is, in principle, the most efficient method of disrupting, modifying, or replacing a target gene. Although homologous integration of exogenous DNA into the genome occurs readily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , it is rare in many other organisms. We identified and disrupted Neurospora crassa genes homologous to human KU70 and KU80 , which encode proteins that function in nonhomologous end-joining of double-stranded DNA breaks. The resulting mutants, named mus - 51 and mus - 52 , showed higher sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, and bleomycin than wild type, but not to UV, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, camptothecin, or hydroxyurea. Vegetative growth, conidiation, and ascospore production in homozygous crosses were normal. The frequency of integration of exogenous DNA into homologous sequences of the genome in the KU disruption strains of N. crassa was compared with that in wild type, mei-3 , and mus - 11 . In mei-3 and mus - 11 , which are defective in homologous recombination, none or few homologous integration events were observed under any conditions. When mtr target DNA with ≈2-kb 5′ and 3′ flanking regions was used for transformation of the KU disruption strains, 100% of transformants exhibited integration at the homologous site, compared to 10 to 30% for a wild-type recipient. Similar results were obtained when the ad-3A gene was targeted for disruption. These results indicate that KU disruption strains are efficient recipients for gene targeting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0402780101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Ninomiya, Y., Suzuki, K., Ishii, C., & Inoue, H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-08-06
Volume
101
Issue
33
Pages
12248-12253
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1590757915
Cited by
599
References
1
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0402780101
The paper
Ninomiya, Y., Suzuki, K., Ishii, C., & Inoue, H. (2004). Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402780101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.