Cited by 258Cellular transport and secretionMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchExtracellular vesicles in disease

Exocytosis of IgG as mediated by the receptor, FcRn: An analysis at the single-molecule level

Open access
Ober, Raimund J., Martinez, Cruz, Lai, Xuming, Zhou, Jinchun, Ward, E. Sally·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

IgG transport within and across cells is essential for effective humoral immunity. Through a combination of biochemical and in vivo analyses, the MHC class I-related neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) is known to play a central role in delivering IgGs within and across cells. However, little is known about the molecular and cellular mechanisms that are involved in the exocytosis of IgG from cells that express FcRn. Here, we use single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to analyze exocytic processes in FcRn-GFP-transfected human endothelial cells. We show that exocytosis can occur by means of multiple modes that range from complete fusion of the exocytic vesicle with the plasma membrane to a slower-release mode ("prolonged release") that only involves partial mixing of membrane contents. Even for prolonged release, diffusion of FcRn into the plasma membrane can occur, indicating that FcRn is directly involved in IgG exocytosis. The slower-release mode is characterized by periodic, stepwise release of IgG, rather than the rapid burst that is observed for complete-fusion events. Analyses of single-molecule tracks suggest that IgG may be bound to FcRn for several seconds after exocytosis. Unexpectedly, after diffusion out of the exocytic site, IgG and FcRn molecules can also migrate back into the epicenter of the release site. Such retrograde movement may represent a mechanism for FcRn retrieval. Our studies provide insight into the events that lead to IgG exocytosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0402970101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 258

Authors
Ober, R. J., Martinez, C., Lai, X., Zhou, J., & Ward, E. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Ward, E. Sally
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-07-16
Volume
101
Issue
30
Pages
11076-11081
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2172126781
Cited by
258
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI053748, R01AI039167, R01AI050747)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
neonatal Fc receptor, IgG transport, sustained drug release, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, retrograde transport, endothelial cells, humoral immunity
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Endothelium, Vascular, Exocytosis, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Kinetics, Microcirculation, Receptors, Fc, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review