The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic analysis of Bacteroides fragilis reveals extensive DNA inversions regulating cell surface adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Bacteroides are predominant human colonic commensals, but the principal pathogenic species, Bacteroides fragilis (BF), lives closely associated with the mucosal surface, whereas a second major species, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (BT), concentrates within the colon. We find corresponding differences in their genomes, based on determination of the genome sequence of BF and comparative analysis with BT. Both species have acquired two mechanisms that contribute to their dominance among the colonic microbiota: an exceptional capability to use a wide range of dietary polysaccharides by gene amplification and the capacity to create variable surface antigenicities by multiple DNA inversion systems. However, the gene amplification for polysaccharide assimilation is more developed in BT, in keeping with its internal localization. In contrast, external antigenic structures can be changed more systematically in BF. Thereby, at the mucosal surface, where microbes encounter continuous attack by host defenses, BF evasion of the immune system is favored, and its colonization and infectious potential are increased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
A Genomic View of the Human- Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Symbiosis
Xu, J., Bjursell, M. K., Himrod, J., Deng, S., Carmichael, L. K., Chiang, H. C., Hooper, L. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080029 · Cited by 1,353
Cited by
Host-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine
Bäckhed, F., Ley, R. E., Sonnenburg, J. L., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104816 · Cited by 5,277
Milani, C., Duranti, S., Bottacini, F., Casey, E., Turroni, F., Mahony, J., Belzer, C., Delgado Palacio, S., Arboleya Montes, S., Mancabelli, L., et al. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00036-17 · Cited by 1,950
Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota
Hooper, L. V., & Macpherson, A. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2710 · Cited by 1,454
IgA Response to Symbiotic Bacteria as a Mediator of Gut Homeostasis
Peterson, D. A., McNulty, N. P., Guruge, J. L., & Gordon, J. I. (2007) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.013 · Cited by 828
The gut microbiota influences anticancer immunosurveillance and general health
Routy, B., Gopalakrishnan, V., Daillère, R., Zitvogel, L., Wargo, J. A., & Kroemer, G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0006-2 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuwahara, T., Yamashita, A., Hirakawa, H., Nakayama, H., Toh, H., Okada, N., Kuhara, S., Hattori, M., Hayashi, T., & Ohnishi, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-10-04
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 14919-14924
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2151925642
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic analysis of Bacteroides fragilis reveals extensive DNA inversions regulating cell surface adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404172101
- The paper
- Kuwahara, T., Yamashita, A., Hirakawa, H., Nakayama, H., Toh, H., Okada, N., Kuhara, S., Hattori, M., Hayashi, T., & Ohnishi, Y. (2004). Genomic analysis of Bacteroides fragilis reveals extensive DNA inversions regulating cell surface adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404172101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.