Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in loblolly pine

Open access
Brown, Garth R., Gill, Geoffrey P., Kuntz, Robert J., Langley, Charles H., Neale, David B.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Outbreeding species with large, stable population sizes, such as widely distributed conifers, are expected to harbor relatively more DNA sequence polymorphism. Under the neutral theory of molecular evolution, the expected heterozygosity is a function of the product 4 N e μ, where N e is the effective population size and μ is the per-generation mutation rate, and the genomic scale of linkage disequilibrium is determined by 4 N e r , where r is the per-generation recombination rate between adjacent sites. These parameters were estimated in the long-lived, outcrossing gymnosperm loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) from a survey of single nucleotide polymorphisms across ≈18 kb of DNA distributed among 19 loci from a common set of 32 haploid genomes. Estimates of 4 N e μ at silent and nonsynonymous sites were 0.00658 and 0.00108, respectively, and both were statistically heterogeneous among loci. By Tajima's D statistic, the site frequency spectrum of no locus was observed to deviate from that predicted by neutral theory. Substantial recombination in the history of the sampled alleles was observed and linkage disequilibrium declined within several kilobases. The composite likelihood estimate of 4 N e r based on all two-site sample configurations equaled 0.00175. When geological dating, an assumed generation time (25 years), and an estimated divergence from Pinus pinaster Ait. are used, the effective population size of loblolly pine should be 5.6 × 10 5 . The emerging narrow range of estimated silent site heterozygosities (relative to the vast range of population sizes) for humans, Drosophila , maize, and pine parallels the paradox described earlier for allozyme polymorphism and challenges simple equilibrium models of molecular evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0404231101

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Brown, G. R., Gill, G. P., Kuntz, R. J., Langley, C. H., & Neale, D. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-10-11
Volume
101
Issue
42
Pages
15255-15260
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2021492782
Cited by
327
References
2
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.