The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fishing down the coast: Historical expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries along continental margins
Abstract
Estuarine ecosystems have changed dramatically from centuries of fishing, habitat disturbance, sedimentation, and nutrient loading. Degradation of oyster reefs by destructive fishing practices in particular has had a profound effect on estuarine ecology, yet the timing and magnitude of oyster-reef degradation in estuaries is poorly quantified. Here, I evaluate the expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries in 28 estuaries along three continental margins through the analysis of historical proxies derived from fishery records to infer when oyster reefs were degraded. Exploitation for oysters did not occur randomly along continental margins but followed a predictable pattern. Oyster fisheries expanded and collapsed in a linear sequence along eastern North America ( Crassostrea virginica ), western North America ( Ostreola conchaphila ), and eastern Australia ( Saccostrea glomerata ). Fishery collapse began in the estuaries that were nearest to a developing urban center before exploitation began to spread down the coast. As each successive fishery collapsed, oysters from more distant estuaries were fished and transported to restock exploited estuaries near the original urban center. This moving wave of exploitation traveled along each coastline until the most distant estuary had been reached and overfished.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Oysters are a significant fishery species in many locations, including the eastern and southern coasts of the United States (Kirby 2004).”
From Collapse of the oyster population in Apalachicola Bay: cascading social impacts from an ecologically and culturally significant species (2025) · cites this paper as Kirby 2004
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.3354/meps009203 · DOI
- Newell R. I. E. (1988) in Understanding the Estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research eds. Lynch M. P. & Krome E. C. (Chesapeake Bay Research Consortium Baltimore) pp. 536-546.
- 10.2307/1352778 · DOI
- Winslow F. (1880) in Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries of Maryland (Wiley Annapolis MD) pp. 105-219.
- Winslow, F. (1882) U.S. Coast Survey Report for 1881 11, 1-87.
- 10.2307/1353281 · DOI
- 10.3354/meps111029 · DOI
- 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0128:HHDTFD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/37.6.612 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1059199 · DOI · Paper page
- Wefer G. Berger W. H. Bijima J. & Fischer G. (1999) in Use of Proxies in Paleoceanography: Examples from the South Atlantic eds. Fischer G. & Wefer G. (Springer Berlin) pp. 1-68. · DOI
- Ingersoll E. (1881) in The History and Present Condition of the Fishery Industries ed. Goode G. B. (U.S. Dept. Interior 10th Census of the United States Washington DC) pp. 1-252.
- McCay B. J. (1998) Oyster Wars and the Public Trust (Univ. Arizona Press Tucson). · DOI
- Galtsoff, P. S. & Seiwell, H. R. (1928) U.S. Dept. Commerce Bur. Fish. Econ. Cir. 66, 1-11.
- Lyles, C. H. (1969) U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Bur. Com. Fish. Curr. Fish. Stat. 5007, 1-116.
- Collins, J. W. (1891) Bull. U.S. Fish Commission 9, 461-497.
- Stevenson, C. H. (1894) Bull. U.S. Fish Commission 1892 12, 203-297.
- Churchill E. P. (1920) The Oyster and the Oyster Industry of the Atlantic and Gulf Coast (Report of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Washington DC). · DOI
- Conte F. S. & Dupuy J. L. (1982) in Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop ed. Chew K. K. (Louisiana State Univ. Press Baton Rouge) pp. 43-63.
- Beattie J. H. McMillin D. & Wiegardt L. (1982) in Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop ed. Chew K. K. (Louisiana State Univ. Press Baton Rouge) pp. 28-38.
- Barrett E. M. (1963) The California Oyster Industry (State of California Resources Agency California Dept. of Fish and Game Fishery Bulletin 123).
- Qualman J. L. (1982) in Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop ed. Chew K. K. (Louisiana State Univ. Press Baton Rouge) pp. 39-42.
- Roughley, T. C. (1922) Mus. App. Arts Sci., Sydney, Tech. Educ. Ser. 25, 1-69.
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01406.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199909/10)9:5<461::AID-AQC353>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89171-5 · DOI
- Breitburg, D. L., Coen, L. D., Luckenbach, M. W., Mann, R., Posey, M., Wesson, & J. A. (2000) J. Shellfish Res. 19, 371-377.
- Mann, R. (2000) J. Shellfish Res. 19, 335-339.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas
Lotze, H. K., Lenihan, H. S., Bourque, B. J., Bradbury, R. H., Cooke, R. G., Kay, M. C., Kidwell, S. M., Kirby, M. X., Peterson, C. H., & Jackson, J. B. C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128035 · Cited by 3,402
Self-citationEcological extinction and evolution in the brave new ocean
Jackson, J. B. C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802812105 · Cited by 611
Drought, Snails, and Large-Scale Die-Off of Southern U.S. Salt Marshes
Silliman, B. R., van de Koppel, J., Bertness, M. D., Stanton, L. E., & Mendelssohn, I. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118229 · Cited by 426
Predicting and Detecting Reciprocity between Indirect Ecological Interactions and Evolution
Estes, J. A., Brashares, J. S., & Power, M. E. (2013) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/668120 · Cited by 58
Mansfield, E., Lester, S., Rassweiler, A., & Brooke, S. (2025) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-15989-300137 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirby, M. X.
- Affiliations
- The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-08-23
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 13096-13099
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review