Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fishing down the coast: Historical expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries along continental margins

Kirby, Michael Xavier·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Estuarine ecosystems have changed dramatically from centuries of fishing, habitat disturbance, sedimentation, and nutrient loading. Degradation of oyster reefs by destructive fishing practices in particular has had a profound effect on estuarine ecology, yet the timing and magnitude of oyster-reef degradation in estuaries is poorly quantified. Here, I evaluate the expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries in 28 estuaries along three continental margins through the analysis of historical proxies derived from fishery records to infer when oyster reefs were degraded. Exploitation for oysters did not occur randomly along continental margins but followed a predictable pattern. Oyster fisheries expanded and collapsed in a linear sequence along eastern North America ( Crassostrea virginica ), western North America ( Ostreola conchaphila ), and eastern Australia ( Saccostrea glomerata ). Fishery collapse began in the estuaries that were nearest to a developing urban center before exploitation began to spread down the coast. As each successive fishery collapsed, oysters from more distant estuaries were fished and transported to restock exploited estuaries near the original urban center. This moving wave of exploitation traveled along each coastline until the most distant estuary had been reached and overfished.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0405150101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.3354/meps009203 · DOI
  2. Newell R. I. E. (1988) in Understanding the Estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research eds. Lynch M. P. & Krome E. C. (Chesapeake Bay Research Consortium Baltimore) pp. 536-546.
  3. 10.2307/1352778 · DOI
  4. Winslow F. (1880) in Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries of Maryland (Wiley Annapolis MD) pp. 105-219.
  5. Winslow, F. (1882) U.S. Coast Survey Report for 1881 11, 1-87.
  6. 10.2307/1353281 · DOI
  7. 10.3354/meps111029 · DOI
  8. 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0128:HHDTFD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/icb/37.6.612 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1059199 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wefer G. Berger W. H. Bijima J. & Fischer G. (1999) in Use of Proxies in Paleoceanography: Examples from the South Atlantic eds. Fischer G. & Wefer G. (Springer Berlin) pp. 1-68. · DOI
  12. Ingersoll E. (1881) in The History and Present Condition of the Fishery Industries ed. Goode G. B. (U.S. Dept. Interior 10th Census of the United States Washington DC) pp. 1-252.
  13. McCay B. J. (1998) Oyster Wars and the Public Trust (Univ. Arizona Press Tucson). · DOI
  14. Galtsoff, P. S. & Seiwell, H. R. (1928) U.S. Dept. Commerce Bur. Fish. Econ. Cir. 66, 1-11.
  15. Lyles, C. H. (1969) U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Bur. Com. Fish. Curr. Fish. Stat. 5007, 1-116.
  16. Collins, J. W. (1891) Bull. U.S. Fish Commission 9, 461-497.
  17. Stevenson, C. H. (1894) Bull. U.S. Fish Commission 1892 12, 203-297.
  18. Churchill E. P. (1920) The Oyster and the Oyster Industry of the Atlantic and Gulf Coast (Report of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Washington DC). · DOI
  19. Conte F. S. & Dupuy J. L. (1982) in Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop ed. Chew K. K. (Louisiana State Univ. Press Baton Rouge) pp. 43-63.
  20. Beattie J. H. McMillin D. & Wiegardt L. (1982) in Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop ed. Chew K. K. (Louisiana State Univ. Press Baton Rouge) pp. 28-38.
  21. Barrett E. M. (1963) The California Oyster Industry (State of California Resources Agency California Dept. of Fish and Game Fishery Bulletin 123).
  22. Qualman J. L. (1982) in Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop ed. Chew K. K. (Louisiana State Univ. Press Baton Rouge) pp. 39-42.
  23. Roughley, T. C. (1922) Mus. App. Arts Sci., Sydney, Tech. Educ. Ser. 25, 1-69.
  24. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01406.x · DOI
  25. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199909/10)9:5<461::AID-AQC353>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89171-5 · DOI
  27. Breitburg, D. L., Coen, L. D., Luckenbach, M. W., Mann, R., Posey, M., Wesson, & J. A. (2000) J. Shellfish Res. 19, 371-377.
  28. Mann, R. (2000) J. Shellfish Res. 19, 335-339.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kirby, M. X.
Affiliations
The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-08-23
Volume
101
Issue
35
Pages
13096-13099
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
340
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review