The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An ecological approach to preventing human infection: Vaccinating wild mouse reservoirs intervenes in the Lyme disease cycle
Open accessAbstract
Many pathogens, such as the agents of West Nile encephalitis and plague, are maintained in nature by animal reservoirs and transmitted to humans by arthropod vectors. Efforts to reduce disease incidence usually rely on vector control or immunization of humans. Lyme disease, for which no human vaccine is currently available, is a commonly reported vector-borne disease in North America and Europe. In a recently developed, ecological approach to disease prevention, we intervened in the natural cycle of the Lyme disease agent (Borrelia burgdorferi) by immunizing wild white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), a reservoir host species, with either a recombinant antigen of the pathogen, outer surface protein A, or a negative control antigen in a repeated field experiment with paired experimental and control grids stratified by site. Outer surface protein A vaccination significantly reduced the prevalence of B. burgdorferi in nymphal blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) collected at the sites the following year in both experiments. The magnitude of the vaccine's effect at a given site correlated with the tick infection prevalence found on the control grid, which in turn correlated with mouse density. These data, as well as differences in the population structures of B. burgdorferi in sympatric ticks and mice, indicated that nonmouse hosts contributed more to infecting ticks than previously expected. Thus, where nonmouse hosts play a large role in infection dynamics, vaccination should be directed at additional species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk factors for human disease emergence
Taylor, L. H., Latham, S. M., & woolhouse, M. E. J. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0888 · Cited by 2,835
Cited by
Impact of Climate Trends on Tick-Borne Pathogen Transmission
Estrada-Peña, A., Ayllón, N., & de la Fuente, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00064 · Cited by 293
Marsot, M., Chapuis, J.-L., Gasqui, P., Dozières, A., Masséglia, S., Pisanu, B., Ferquel, E., & Vourc’h, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055377 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsao, J. I., Wootton, J. T., Bunikis, J., Luna, M. G., Fish, D., & Barbour, A. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-12-17
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 18159-18164
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2012706326
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An ecological approach to preventing human infection: Vaccinating wild mouse reservoirs intervenes in the Lyme disease cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0405763102
- The paper
- Tsao, J. I., Wootton, J. T., Bunikis, J., Luna, M. G., Fish, D., & Barbour, A. G. (2004). An ecological approach to preventing human infection: Vaccinating wild mouse reservoirs intervenes in the Lyme disease cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405763102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.