Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microevolution and history of the plague bacillus, Yersinia pestis

Achtman, Mark, Morelli, Giovanna, Zhu, Peixuan, Wirth, Thierry, Diehl, Ines, Kusecek, Barica, Vogler, Amy J., Wagner, David M., Allender, Christopher J., Easterday, W. Ryan, Chenal-Francisque, Viviane, Worsham, Patricia, Thomson, Nicholas R., Parkhill, Julian, Lindler, Luther E., Carniel, Elisabeth, Keim, Paul·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The association of historical plague pandemics with Yersinia pestis remains controversial, partly because the evolutionary history of this largely monomorphic bacterium was unknown. The microevolution of Y. pestis was therefore investigated by three different multilocus molecular methods, targeting genomewide synonymous SNPs, variation in number of tandem repeats, and insertion of IS 100 insertion elements. Eight populations were recognized by the three methods, and we propose an evolutionary tree for these populations, rooted on Yersinia pseudotuberculosis . The tree invokes microevolution over millennia, during which enzootic pestoides isolates evolved. This initial phase was followed by a binary split 6,500 years ago, which led to populations that are more frequently associated with human disease. These populations do not correspond directly to classical biovars that are based on phenotypic properties. Thus, we recommend that henceforth groupings should be based on molecular signatures. The age of Y. pestis inferred here is compatible with the dates of historical pandemic plague. However, it is premature to infer an association between any modern molecular grouping and a particular pandemic wave that occurred before the 20th century.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0408026101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Yersin, A. (1894) Ann. Inst. Pasteur 2, 428-430.
  2. Devignat, R. (1951) Bull. W. H. O. 4, 247-263.14859080
  3. 10.1128/jb.184.4.1019-1027.2002 · DOI
  4. 10.1099/00221287-148-6-1687 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/gr.1507303 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/JB.186.15.5138-5146.2004 · DOI
  7. 10.1186/1471-2180-4-22 · DOI
  8. 10.1128/CMR.17.2.434-464.2004 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/JB.186.15.5147-5152.2004 · DOI
  10. Hirsch, A. (1881) in Handbuch der Historisch-Geographischen Pathologie (Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart), Vol. I, pp. 349-384.
  11. Karlsson, G. (1996) J. Med. Hist. 22, 263-284.
  12. 10.1353/hub.2003.0067 · DOI
  13. Twigg, G. (2003) Local Popul. Stud. 71, 40-52.14974470
  14. 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12637 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.220225197 · DOI
  16. 10.1099/mic.0.26594-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9869 · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00873.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S1567-1348(02)00089-8 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.1081449 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1533 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/JB.182.10.2928-2936.2000 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3179-3185.2001 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0401561101 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/35097083 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/dnares/11.3.179 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/JB.184.16.4601-4611.2002 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244 · DOI
  29. 10.1128/jb.73.5.641-648.1957 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.7973728 · DOI
  31. Whittam, T. S. (1996) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella, eds. Curtiss, R., III, Ingraham, J. L., Lin, E. C. C., Low, K. B., Magasanik, B., Reznikoff, W. S., Riley, M., Schaechter, M. & Umbarger, H. E. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC), Vol. 2, pp. 2708-2720.
  32. 10.1007/BF02100192 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF02111283 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0403844101 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.meegid.2004.02.005 · DOI
  36. Wiechmann, I. & Grupe, G. (2004) Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 126, 48-55.
  37. 10.3201/eid1009.030933 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Achtman, M., Morelli, G., Zhu, P., Wirth, T., Diehl, I., Kusecek, B., Vogler, A. J., Wagner, D. M., Allender, C. J., Easterday, W. R., Chenal-Francisque, V., Worsham, P., Thomson, N. R., Parkhill, J., Lindler, L. E., Carniel, E., & Keim, P.
Affiliations
Department of Molecular Biology, Max-Planck Institut für Infektionsbiologie, D-10117 Berlin, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640; Yersinia Research Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France; U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5011; The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom; National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center,...
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-12-14
Volume
101
Issue
51
Pages
17837-17842
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
440
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microevolution and history of the plague bacillus, Yersinia pestis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0408026101
The paper
Achtman, M., Morelli, G., Zhu, P., Wirth, T., Diehl, I., Kusecek, B., Vogler, A. J., Wagner, D. M., Allender, C. J., Easterday, W. R., Chenal-Francisque, V., Worsham, P., Thomson, N. R., Parkhill, J., Lindler, L. E., Carniel, E., & Keim, P. (2004). Microevolution and history of the plague bacillus, Yersinia pestis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408026101