Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 907

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions

Open access
Löytynoja, Ari, Goldman, Nick·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Dynamic programming algorithms guarantee to find the optimal alignment between two sequences. For more than a few sequences, exact algorithms become computationally impractical, and progressive algorithms iterating pairwise alignments are widely used. These heuristic methods have a serious drawback because pairwise algorithms do not differentiate insertions from deletions and end up penalizing single insertion events multiple times. Such an unrealistically high penalty for insertions typically results in overmatching of sequences and an underestimation of the number of insertion events. We describe a modification of the traditional alignment algorithm that can distinguish insertion from deletion and avoid repeated penalization of insertions and illustrate this method with a pair hidden Markov model that uses an evolutionary scoring function. In comparison with a traditional progressive alignment method, our algorithm infers a greater number of insertion events and creates gaps that are phylogenetically consistent but spatially less concentrated. Our results suggest that some insertion/deletion “hot spots” may actually be artifacts of traditional alignment algorithms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0409137102

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Levenshtein, V. I. (1966) Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10 , 707-710.
  2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.1.41 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.1.41
  3. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90398-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1145/360825.360861 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Myers, E. W. & Miller, W. (1988) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 4 , 11-17.3382986
  6. 10.1137/0128004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/prot.340090304 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/BF02257378 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hein, J. (1989) Mol. Biol. Evol. 6 , 649-668.2488477
  14. Durbin R. Eddy S. Krogh A. & Mitchison G. (1998) Biological Sequence Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge U.K.). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gonnet G. H. & Benner S. A. (1996) in Algorithm Theory: SWAT'96 eds. Karlsson R. & Lingas A. (Springer Berlin) pp. 380-391. · doi:10.1007/3-540-61422-2_147
  16. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02272-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 907

Metadata

Authors
Löytynoja, A., & Goldman, N.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-07-06
Volume
102
Issue
30
Pages
10557-10562
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1646393397
Cited by
907
References
4
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0409137102
The paper
Löytynoja, A., & Goldman, N. (2005). An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409137102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.