Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS

Open access
Steen, Hanno, Jebanathirajah, Judith A., Springer, Michael, Kirschner, Marc W.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative information are crucial to a detailed understanding of the function of protein phosphorylation. MS is now becoming a quantitative approach to analyze protein phosphorylation. All methods that have been described either require the elaborate/expensive use of stable isotopes to compare a limited number of samples or do not provide phosphorylation stoichiometries. Here, we present stable isotope-free MS strategies that allow relative and absolute quantitation of phosphorylation stoichiometries. By using the developed methods, we can normalize to robustly account for run-to-run variations and variations in amounts of starting material. This procedure monitors the unmodified proteolytic peptides derived from the protein of interest and identifies peptides that are suitable for normalization purposes. Also, we can determine changes in phosphorylation stoichiometry by monitoring the changes in the normalized ion currents of the phosphopeptide(s) of interest. Absolute phosphorylation stoichiometry are measured by monitoring the ion currents of a phosphopeptide and its unmodified cognate as the signal intensity changes of both peptide species are correlated. The method is applicable to multiply phosphorylated species (for which one more sample with varying phosphorylation stoichiometry than number of phosphorylation sites is required to correct for the differences in the ionization/detection efficiencies of the phosphopeptide, its partially phosphorylated and unphosphorylated cognates). Last, we can quantitate species with ragged ends resulting from incomplete proteolysis and measure phosphorylation stoichiometries of single samples by controlled dephosphorylation. These approaches were validated and subsequently applied to the phosphorylation of the yeast transcription factor Pho4.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0409536102

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Steen, H., Jebanathirajah, J. A., Springer, M., & Kirschner, M. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-03
Volume
102
Issue
11
Pages
3948-3953
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2070391349
Cited by
206
References
2
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0409536102
The paper
Steen, H., Jebanathirajah, J. A., Springer, M., & Kirschner, M. W. (2005). Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409536102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.