The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrogen and bioenergetics in the Yellowstone geothermal ecosystem
Open accessAbstract
The geochemical energy budgets for high-temperature microbial ecosystems such as occur at Yellowstone National Park have been unclear. To address the relative contributions of different geochemistries to the energy demands of these ecosystems, we draw together three lines of inference. We studied the phylogenetic compositions of high-temperature (>70°C) communities in Yellowstone hot springs with distinct chemistries, conducted parallel chemical analyses, and carried out thermodynamic modeling. Results of extensive molecular analyses, taken with previous results, show that most microbial biomass in these systems, as reflected by rRNA gene abundance, is comprised of organisms of the kinds that derive energy for primary productivity from the oxidation of molecular hydrogen, H 2 . The apparent dominance by H 2 -metabolizing organisms indicates that H 2 is the main source of energy for primary production in the Yellowstone high-temperature ecosystem. Hydrogen concentrations in the hot springs were measured and found to range up to >300 nM, consistent with this hypothesis. Thermodynamic modeling with environmental concentrations of potential energy sources also is consistent with the proposed microaerophilic, hydrogen-based energy economy for this geothermal ecosystem, even in the presence of high concentrations of sulfide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
H 2 -rich fluids from serpentinization: Geochemical and biotic implications
Sleep, N. H., Meibom, A., Fridriksson, T., Coleman, R. G., & Bird, D. K. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0405289101 · Cited by 568
Cited by
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling
Cushman, S. A., McKelvey, K. S., Hayden, J., & Schwartz, M. K. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/506976 · Cited by 590
Serpentinization as a source of energy at the origin of life
RUSSELL, M. J., HALL, A. J., & MARTIN, W. (2010) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00249.x · Cited by 527
A korarchaeal genome reveals insights into the evolution of the Archaea
Elkins, J. G., Podar, M., Graham, D. E., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y., Randau, L., Hedlund, B. P., Brochier-Armanet, C., Kunin, V., Anderson, I., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801980105 · Cited by 296
Papineau, D., Walker, J. J., Mojzsis, S. J., & Pace, N. R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.8.4822-4832.2005 · Cited by 209
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Spear, J. R., Walker, J. J., McCollom, T. M., & Pace, N. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-01-25
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2555-2560
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1518260195
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.