Evolutionary analysis of the well characterized endo16 promoter reveals substantial variation within functional sites
Open accessAbstract
The evolutionary mechanisms that operate on genetic variation within transcriptional regulatory sequences are not well understood. We present here an evolutionary analysis of an exceptionally well characterized cis-regulatory region, the endo16 promoter of the purple sea urchin. Segregating variation reveals striking differences in the intensity of negative selection among regulatory modules, reflecting their distinct functional roles. Surprisingly, transcription-factor-binding sites are as polymorphic and as likely to contain fixed differences as flanking nucleotides. Whereas nucleotides in protein-binding sites in the most proximal regulatory module exhibit reduced variation, those in other modules tend to be more polymorphic than putatively nonfunctional nucleotides. Two unrelated large insertions at the same position within the promoter are segregating at low frequencies; one is a strong ectodermal repressor that contains 16 verified transcription-factor-binding sites. These results demonstrate that a simple relationship between conservation and function does not exist within this cis-regulatory region and highlight significant population heterogeneity in the fine structure of a well understood promoter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The arrangement, spacing, and number of target sites are relatively insignificant.
“The arrangement, spacing, and number of these sites is relatively insignificant (Balhoff and Wray, 2005; Cameron and Davidson, 2009; Dermitzakis et al., 2003; Liberman and Stathopoulos, 2009; Ludwig et al., 2000; Walters et al., 2008).”
From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Balhoff and Wray, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Balhoff, J. P., & Wray, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wray, Gregory A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-06-03
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 8591-8596
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1150811
- OpenAlex
- W1993741978
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG21583)
- National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- cis-regulatory elements, transcription factor binding sites, negative selection, regulatory polymorphisms, purple sea urchin, transcriptional regulation, population heterogeneity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Cloning, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proteins, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Evolution, Molecular, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review